Доклады казахской академии образования Ежеквартальный журнал издается с 2008 года



Pdf көрінісі
бет80/103
Дата23.10.2022
өлшемі2,64 Mb.
#45039
түріДоклад
1   ...   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   ...   103
Байланысты:
KAO-3-2020

intercultural education [1].
Two 
opposing 
trends 
characterize 
contemporary 
society: 
globalization/mondialisation and regionalization/localization. If the first 
one targets the planetary dimension, the second one is a natural response to 
globalization, is the move back to tight space: small-scale areas (regions, 
districts), small cultures, human groups formed on the basis of identity factors 
such as language, religion, ethnic. However, both are the effects of 
internationalization of economic, cultural and communication phenomena, 
and even they haven’t obviously the same goals, they are completed by 
searching for unity in diversity and identity in difference in order to keep an 
absolutely necessary balance. The dynamic movements are provided by a 
dominant force, represented in principle by a whole geopolitical and cultural 
entity, which trends to generalize its values, cultural products, language. The 
universalist principle, whose enforcement is sought by institutions and 
organizations that currently leads the planet, is that of human rights. 
1. The economic context, multilingualism and intercultural 
communication 
Homogeneous society, where expectations for action and human 
behaviour are fully stabilized, the individual is not confronted with 
unexpected situations, is already in many parts of the world subject of change. 
Obviously cultural heterogeneity in many countries is not a recent feature, 
minority ethnic groups have always existed in geographically delimited areas 
of many human groups defined as a nation. However, regardless of ethnicity, 
the individuals of a national state are identified and they are still identified 
with the national state where they live. One of the effects of globalization is 
just changing this image about the nation.  
Paradigmatic of the two phases of modernization of societies there can 
be identified several pairs of characteristics that find their form of expression 
both in macro structures, such as the society itself, the economy, the 
education, and in micro structures as well as such as foreign language 
learning. These pairs of features (Table 1) should not be understood as 
antonyms. 


284 
Table 1: The characteristics of First and Second Modernization 


Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   ...   103




©emirsaba.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет