Доклады казахской академии образования Ежеквартальный журнал издается с 2008 года
жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| First Modernization
Second Modernization structure-oriented thinking process-oriented thinking autonomy attempt integration into networks control own internal dynamic concreteness vagueness either …. or as well …. as coherent identities cohesive identities closeness openness delimitation diffusion circularity ramification Homogeneity in principle ensures a climate of trust, and without this condition the human interaction was and is still unthinkable. But in terms of current economic globalization we can’t talk about such stability anymore. Moving in different cultural spaces and dealing with a variety of value systems make cultural homogeneity no more a self-evident condition. By integration in different contexts, in the most cases from different geographical areas, an individual is compelled to develop multiple identities; he is subjected to a process of hybridization, creolization [2]. The oscillation between identity and alterity is on the one hand recognition of differences, and on the other hand the searching within these differences of general normative benchmarks, of some “consensual islands” that ensure a balance in the interaction. The alternation between homogenizing globalization, based on the Western capitalism, and the particularization trends advocating for local and regional cultures is the characteristic of current social and economic phenomena. Amid the economic structures of any kind they may be, ranging from industrial, commercial, advertising, banking or financial to staff management, the concepts “transculturally” and “transversally” have the most powerful relevance. On the one hand, the dynamic economic area does not give enough time to develop an intercultural dialogue, where it is fundamental to understand what is different and not just perception and adaptation to a new, one and on the other hand, activity of individuals from different cultures and mentalities, in a well-defined organizational framework, with rules, norms, conventions and even specific cultural traditions, cannot be held as long as there is not accepted an overlap of various cultural elements, vertically from the mother organization in subsidiaries and horizontally between members of the organization. Such a context justifies the fact that the individual can not 285 belong only “to a single cultural circle” and transculturally is a possible middle way between global homogenization and regional/local жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|