Table 1 – Chemical composition of the studied herbage mixtures in 2017-2018 versus the sowing time,%
Indicators
|
1. Herbal mixture
|
2. Herbage mixture
|
3. Herbage mixture
|
Sowing time
|
ІІ/V
(st)
|
III/V
|
+,-st.-тан
|
ІІ/V
(st)
|
III/V
|
+,- st.-тан
|
ІІ/V
(st)
|
III/V
|
+,- st.-тан
|
Crude protein
|
2,62
|
2,88
|
+0,26
|
2,75
|
2,78
|
+0,03
|
2,78
|
2,87
|
+0,09
|
Crude fat
|
1,05
|
1,03
|
-0,02
|
0,58
|
0,57
|
-0,01
|
0,55
|
0,58
|
+0,03
|
Crude fiber
|
8,04
|
8,45
|
+0,41
|
8,39
|
8,54
|
+0,15
|
8,25
|
8,42
|
+0,17
|
NFE
|
2,46
|
2,51
|
+0,05
|
2,68
|
2,74
|
+0,06
|
2,54
|
2,66
|
+0,12
|
Sol
|
11,8
|
12,3
|
+0,43
|
12,05
|
11,92
|
-0,13
|
12,88
|
12,27
|
-0,61
|
Calcium
|
0,07
|
0,10
|
+0,03
|
0,06
|
0,07
|
+0,01
|
0,08
|
0,08
|
0,00
|
Phosphorus
|
0,05
|
0,05
|
0,00
|
0,06
|
0,06
|
0,00
|
0,05
|
0,05
|
0,00
|
Note: (st) – control option; II/V – second decade of May; III/V–third decade of May; +, - st.─ Variance from the control variant
|
This is due to the fact that there was more herbage mixtures in the control variant than in other variants due to the presence of an oilseed crop - rapeseed [10, 11].
Compared to the average biannual values, the dry weight of African millet in the herbage mixture, which formed the highest yield of green mass in the course of stemming, flowering and ear formation of cereals, amounted to 122.0 c/ha, and dry fodder - 22.8%. During themowing period, the average yield of rapeseed was 87.6 c/ha. Among the options, the highest yield of green mass was made up of herbage mixtures with the sowing of African millet. That is, the yield of African millet was 34.4 c/ha higher than that of the control variant of the herbage mixture (table 2).
Table 2 – Average biennium yield of green and dry matter in the years of herbage mixtures, kg/ha (2017-2018)
Herbage mixtures
|
Productivity of green mass, c/ha
|
Productivity dry mass, c/ha
|
2017
|
2018
|
Beinniumaverage
|
2017
|
2018
|
Beinniumaverage
|
Barley + peas + hybrid sorghum-Sudan grass + Sudan grass + rapeseed
|
25,7
|
149,4
|
87,6
|
5,1
|
37,2
|
21,1
|
Barley + peas + hybrid sorghum-Sudan grass + Sudan grass + rapeseed
|
37,7
|
177,6
|
107,7
|
9,0
|
42,3
|
25,6
|
Barley + peas + hybrid sorghum-Sudan grass + Sudan grass + African millet
|
53,3
|
190,6
|
122,0
|
10,3
|
45,5
|
27,9
|
LSD0,5
|
1,3
|
1,6
|
1,4
|
1,3
|
1,7
|
2,1
|
The periods of stemming and earring of cereals in the herbage mixture coincided with the July precipitation, which was characterized by heavy foliage and a higher crude protein content compared to the control. A great deal of scientists noted in their research that a higher chemical content of crude protein is observed in plant leaves than in stems [12-14].
Conclusion. The study findings indicate that both the yield of various herbage mixtures of green and dry mass, their average feed unit, and the corresponding rations, are the basis for efficient and intensive dairy cows and cattle feeding.
References:
Message of President N. Nazarbayev to the people of Kazakhstan "Kazakhstani way - 2050: common goal, common interest, common future//Vesti. ─ 2014. № 3 (6355)
Nurgaliyev, K.S. Atakulov T.A., Sadvakasov S.S. Productivity and nutritional value of the pasture mass of legume-cereal herbage mixtures in the foothill-steppe zone of the southeast of Kazakhstan//Izdenister, natizheler. ─ 2014.─ №2, pp. 162-166
Telichko, O.N. Sharova O.V. TUse of field peas (pisumsativum l.) in mixed sowing // Far Eastern Agrarian Bulletin. ─2015.─ №4 (36). P. 27-31.
Telichko, O.N. Emelyanov A.N. Productivity and nutritional value of herbage mixturesversus the species composition in the conditions of the Primorskarea // Bulletin of the Altay State Agrarian University. ─2014.─ №1 (111), p. 9-14.
Artemyev, A.A. Kapitanov M.P., Pronin A.A. Productivity and quality of annual herbage mixtures depending on the ratio of components // Journal of Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC ─2010.─№3 P. 35-37
Kashevarov, N.I. Polishchuk A.A., Kashevarova N.N., Khazov M.V. Productivity of multi-species crops of African millet with fodder beans and peas // Siberian Bulletin of Agricultural Science. ─2013.─ №2 (231). P. 42-47.
Chen, Z. Y. Du X., Yang Y. Y., Cui X. M., Zhang Z. J., Li Y. Comparative study of chemical composition and active components against alpha-glucosidase of various medicinal parts of Morus alba L // Biomedical Chromatography. ‒ 2018. ‒ T. 32, № 11. ‒ C. 10.DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4328
El Karamany, M. F. Omer H. A. A., Bakry B. A., Bakhoum G. S., Sadak M. S. Impact of tryptophan treatment on yield and chemical composition of Berseem green fodder // Bioscience Research. ‒ 2018. ‒ T. 15, № 4. ‒ C. 3679-3694.
Fluck, A. C. Schafhauser J., Alfaya H., Costa O. A. D., Farias G. D., Scheibler R. B., Rizzo F. A., Manfron J. A. S., Fioreze V. I., Rosler D. C. Chemical composition of annual ryegrass forage and silage for different drying times and phenological phases // ArquivoBrasileiro De MedicinaVeterinaria E Zootecnia. ‒ 2018. ‒ T. 70, № 6. ‒ C. 1979-1987.DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-9981
Iurcu, I. Cosman S. Chemical composition of the perennial plant sorghum and fodder prepared and hay // Scientific Papers-Series D-Animal Science. ‒ 2019. ‒ T. 62, № 1. ‒ C. 92-96.
Jaskiewicz, B. Chemical composition of winter triticale grain depending on type of tillage in crop rotation // 18th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development / Malinovska L., Osadcuks V. ‒ Jelgava: Latvia Univ Agriculture, Faculty Engineering, Inst Mechanics, 2019. ‒ C. 319-323.DOI: 10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N074
Simeanu, D. Boisteanu P. C., Lazar R., Vintila V., Avarvarei B. V. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of soybean meal // Scientific Papers-Series D-Animal Science. ‒ 2019. ‒ T. 62, № 1. ‒ C. 97-104.
Vasin, V. G. Tcybulskii A. V., Kiseleva L. V., Kozhevnikova O. P., Saniev R. N., Adamov A. A. Productivity, Quality, And Amino Acid Composition Of Sudan Grass And Sunflower Mixtures Grown With Soybean And/Or Spring Vetch For Haylage-Silage Use // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences. ‒ 2018. ‒ T. 9, № 5. ‒ C. 1230-1241.
Vetharaniam, I. Vibart R. E., Pacheco D. Evaluation of a sheep rumen model with fresh forages of diverse chemical composition // Journal of Animal Science. ‒ 2018. ‒ T. 96, № 12. ‒ C. 5287-5299.doi: 10.1093/jas/sky354
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |