Литературы
1. G.T. Bekmanova and B.Zh. Ergesh. 2010. A system for automatic alternation of Kazakh
words: word forms generator module. In Proceedings of Lomonosov 2010 international conference.
2. G.T. Bekmanova. 2010. On the approaches to automated word alternation and
morphological analysis of Kazakh language. In Proceedings of the second international conference
on informatics society, pages 466–469.
3. Thorsten Brants. 2000. Tnt: a statistical part-of speech tagger. In Proceedings of the sixth
conference on Applied natural language processing, pages 224–231. Association for Computational
Linguistics.
4. E. Brill and R. Moore. 2000. An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction.
In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong
Kong.
5. Eric Brill. 1992. A simple rule-based part of speech tagger. In Proceedings of the workshop
on Speech and Natural Language, pages 112–116. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6.
7. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st
North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference, NAACL
2000, pages 132–139, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Grzegorz Chrupala. 2006. Simple data driven context sensitive lemmatization.
Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 37:121–127.
9. K. Church andW. Gale. 1991. Probability scoring for spelling correction. Statistics and
Computing, 1(2):93–103.
10. Michael John Collins. 1996. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies.
In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages
184–191. Association for Computational Linguistics
11. Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2004. Induction of a simple morphology for highly
inflecting languages. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in
Computational Phonology: Current Themes in Computational Phonology and Morphology, pages
43–51. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Doug Cutting, Julian Kupiec, Jan Pedersen, and Penelope Sibun. 1992. A practical part-of
speech tagger. In Proceedings of the third conference on Applied natural language processing,
pages 133–140. Association for Computational Linguistics
13. Fred J. Damerau. 1964. A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors.
Commun. ACM, 7(3):171–176.
14. David Elworthy. 1995. Tagset design and inflected languages. In In EACL SIGDAT
workshop From Texts to Tags: Issues in Multilingual Language Analysis, pages 1–10.
15. Anna Feldman. 2008. Tagset design, inflected languages, and n-gram tagging. Editors: Paul
Robertson and John Adamson, 3(1):151.
16. Sheila A. Greibach. 1964. Formal parsing systems. Commun. ACM, 7(8):499–504, August.
17. Jan Haji?c and Barbora Hladk?a. 1998. Tagging inflective languages: prediction of
morphological categories for a rich, structured tagset. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of
the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational
173
Linguistics - Volume 1, ACL ’98, pages 483–490, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for
Computational Linguistics.
18. Dilek Z Hakkani-Tur, Kemal Oflazer, and Gokhan Tur. 2002. Statistical morphological
disambiguation for agglutinative languages. Computers and the Humanities, 36(4):381–410.
19. Jirka Hana and Anna Feldman. 2010. A positional tagset for russian. Proceedings of LREC-
10. Malta.
20. James Henderson. 2004. Discriminative training of a neural network statistical parser. In
Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL’04,
Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Dan Klein and Christopher D Manning. 2002. Conditional structure versus conditional
estimation in NLP models. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in
natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 9–16. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Dan Klein and Christopher D Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In
Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics-Volume 1,
pages 423–430. Association for Computational Linguistics
23. Oskar Kohonen, Sami Virpioja, and Mikaela Klami. 2009. Allomorfessor: Towards
unsupervised morpheme analysis. In Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal
Information Access, pages 975–982. Springer.
24. Kimmo Koskenniemi. 1983. Two-level model for morphological analysis. In Proceedings of
the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 683–685.
25. V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and
reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady., 10(8):707–710, February.
26. Bao-Liang Lu, Qing Ma, Michinori Ichikawa, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2003. Efficient part-of
speech tagging with a min-max modular neural network model. Applied Intelligence, 19(1-2):65–
81.
27. Olzhas Makhambetov, Aibek Makazhanov, Zhandos Yessenbayev, Bakhyt Matkarimov,
Islam Sabyrgaliyev, and Anuar Sharafudinov. 2013. Assembling the kazakh language corpus. In
Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (to appear).
28. Christopher D Manning. 2011. Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: is it time for
some linguistics? In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 171–189.
Springer.
29. Mitchell P. Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a
large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Comput. Linguist., 19(2):313–330, June
30. E. Mays, F. Damerau, and R. Mercer. 1991. Context based spelling correction. Information
Processing & Management, 27(5):517–522.
31. Microsoft. 2010. Microsoft Office 2010, Kazakh language pack.
32. Akmaral Mussayeva. 2008. Kazakh language spelling with hunspell in openoffice.org.
Technical report, The University of Nottingham.
33. nlpub.ru. 2013. A small directory of linguistic resources for processing Russian language:
nlpub.ru.
34. Anthony G Oettinger. 1961. Automatic syntactic analysis and the pushdown store. American
Mathematical Society.
35. Kemal Oflazer and Cemaleddin Guzey. 1994. Spelling correction in agglutinative languages.
In ANLP, pages 194–195.
36. Kemal Oflazer. 1994. Two-level description of Turkish morphology. Literary and linguistic
computing, 9(2):137–148.
37. Praharshana Perera and ReneWitte. 2005. A self-learning context-aware lemmatizer for
German. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical
Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 636–643. Association for Computational
Linguistics.
38. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1999. Learning to parse natural language with maximum entropy
models. Mach. Learn., 34(1-3):151–175, February.
174
39. Has?im Sak, Tunga G?ung?or, and Murat Sarac?lar. 2009. A stochastic finite-state
morphological parser for turkish. In Proceedings of the ACLIJCNLP 2009 Conference short papers,
pages 273–276. Association for Computational Linguistics.
40. Helmut Schmid. 1994a. Part-of-speech tagging with neural networks. In Proceedings of the
15th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1, pages 172–176. Association for
Computational Linguistics.
41. Helmut Schmid. 1994b. Probabilistic part-of speech tagging using decision trees. In
Proceedings of international conference on new methods in language processing, volume 12, pages
44–49. Manchester, UK.
42. Claude E. Shannon. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system
technical journal, 27:379–423, July.
43. A.A. Sharipbayev and A.K. Buribayeva. 2010a. Kazakh speech synthesis on a hardware
level. In Proceedings of the second international conference on building information-aware society,
pages 557–558.
44. A.A. Sharipbayev and A.K. Buribayeva. 2010b. Kazakh speech synthesis on a hardware
level in the Quartus II environment. pages 197–203.
45. A.A. Sharipbayev, G.T. Bekmanova, B.Zh. Ergesh, A.K. Buribayeva, and M. Kh.
Karabalayeva. 2012. Intellectual morphological analyzer based on semantic networks. In
Proceedings of the OSTIS-2012, pages 397–400.
46. Rustem Takhanov and V. Kolmogorov. 2013. Inference algorithms for pattern-based crfs on
sequence data. In International conference on machine learning
47. Scott M Thede and Mary P Harper. 1999. A second-order hidden Markov model for part-of
speech tagging. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational
Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, pages 175–182. Association for Computational
Linguistics.
48. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-
rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003
Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on
Human Language Technology-Volume 1, pages 173–180. Association for Computational
Linguistics.
175
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |