Microsoft Word 1 География doc



Pdf көрінісі
бет31/146
Дата08.11.2022
өлшемі16,6 Mb.
#48309
1   ...   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   ...   146
Froth Floatation process 
Two quartz samples were subjected to the Floatation process. The obtained samples by 
Floatation were subjected to chemical analyses and the obtained analyses are given in table 1. 
Table 1 
Chemical analyses of the quartz samples before and after Floatation 
Before Floatation 
After Floatation 
Sample № 
M
1
 
M
2
 
M
1*
 
M
2*
 
Wt% – 
– 99.83 99.85 
Concentrate 
Wt gm 
– 
– 
465.23 
485.3 
Wt% – 
– 0.17 0.15 
Tails 
Wt gm 
– 
– 
0.77 
0.7 
Major oxides (wt%) 
SiO
2
99.60 99.50 99.72 99.62 
TiO
2
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
A1
2
O
3
0.19 0.16 0.05 0.04 
Fe
2
O
3
0.02 
0.014 
0.016 
0.010 
MnO 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
MgO 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
CaO 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
Na
2

< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
< 0.01 
K
2

< 0.01 
< 0.01 
<0.01 
<0.01 
P
2
O
5
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 
L.O.I 0.089 
0. 
192 
0.08 
0.1 
Some Trace elements (ppm) 
Cr 
3 4 2.8 3 
Co 
5 5 5 5 
Ni 4 
12 
3.5 

Cu 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
Zn 
4 7 4 7 
Ga 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
As 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
< 1 
Zr 


< 1 
< 1 
Pb 7 

4.2 
4.2 


< 1 

< 1 
¾
Devices used: American Floatation device model Denever of speed 1000 turns/ Minute, 
pH Meter Device. 
¾
Chemicals used: Armac С "collection" 1.5 kg / ton, Pine oil "cause foam" 200 gm / ton, 
Kerosene 1.5 kg / ton, H
2
SO

Acid 1.5 kg/ton, HCL Acid 1.5 kg /ton.
¾
Floatation steps: 
1. 
Weight and record the sample. 
2. 
Put the sample in a mixing cup of ratio 1:4 solid to liquid. 
3. 
Adjust pH at 2–4 using H
2
SO
4



Вестник КазНУ. Серия географическая. 2010, №2 (31) 
28 
4. 
Add Armac С "Collector"+ Kerosene + Pine oil. And operate the device and Floatation 
process start. 
As shown in Table 1, it is clear that SiO
2
content is increased (from 99.50–99.60 before 
Floatation to 99.62–99.72% after Floatation). Also there is a marked decrease of A12O3 (from 
0.16–0.19% before Floatation to 0.04–0.05% after Floatation) and Fe
2
O
3
(from 0.014–0.02% before 
Floatation to 0.01–-0.016% after Floatation) to a noticeable percents. 
Some of the trace elements such as Cr, Ni, Zr and Pb also displayed a noticeable decrease 
after froth Floatation while the rest of them did not affected. 
Magnetic separation process 
Apparatus  
Wet magnetic separation device of separator type LHWL at separation efficiency from 200 to 
2000 Jaws. 
Procedure 
The separation is done under magnetic field at 2000 Jaws. The samples pass through dipoles 
with the presence of thin stainless steel wire. The magnetic part of the two poles attracts to 
themselves, the electric current must be off, and the vessel must be substituted and washed to take 
off the unmagnetic samples. This operation must be done twice for each sample, the first for rough 
separation and the second for cleaning and assuring quality separating and minimizing ferrous 
impurities in the nonmagnetic products. The device is capable to separate all iron oxides that are 
represented by magnetite and ilmenite, in addition to the heavy silicates and others. The single 
sample in the single time is equal 100 gms. The apparatus separates only the fine grain sizes
(-50 microns) using the wet method in a ratio of 1 (solid): 2 (liquid). 
The analyses results of the floated quartz samples that subjected to magnetic separation 
process are shown in Table 2. 
Table 2 


Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   ...   146




©emirsaba.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет