Of L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University педагогика. Психология. ӘЛеуметтану
жүктеу/скачать 3,76 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| References
1. Guillamón-Suesta F. & Renau M. L. A critical vision of the CLIL approach in secondary education: A study in the Valencian Community in Spain// Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning. -2015. № 8 (1), P.1-12. 2. Coyle D., Hood P. & Marsh D. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 3. Watanabe, Y., Ikeda, M., & Izumi, S. (Eds) (2012). CLIL: New Challenges in Foreign Language Education. Volume 2 Practices and applications, Tokyo: Sophia University Press. 4. Ikeda, M. (2013). Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Potential for the ‘weak’ version of CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), p 32. 5. Mahisto, P., Marsh, D. & Frigols Maria, J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. Oxford: Macmillan Education, p. 29–30. 6. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (1995). – URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K950001000 (Accessed: 5.09.20). 7. Mehisto, P., Frigols, M., Marsh, D. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan. 8. Kakenov R. Teachers’ Experiences of Using CLIL in Kazakh Language Classrooms NUGSE Research in Education, 2(2), p. 2. 9. Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), р. 39-64. 10. Pavón, V. & Gaustad, M. (2013). Designing Bilingual Programmes for Higher Education in Spain. Organisational, Curricular and Methodological Decisions. International CLIL Research Journal, 2 (1), 81–94. 11. Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish Languages Review, 13, 1-18. – URL: https://www.scilt.org.uk/portals/24/library/slr/issues/13/slr13_coyle.pdf (Accessed: 5.09.20). 12. Bekenova А. (2016). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as a Response to the Trilingual Education Implementation: Teachers’ perception, Practices, and Challenges. May, p. 15. 13. Marsh, D., Maltjers, A., Hartiala, A. (eds). (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms – languages open doors. Finland: University of Jyväskylä. 14. Zhanysbayeva А.М. Implementation of CLIL (content language integrated learning) model at trilingual schools in Kazakhstan. - 2018. - № 10 (30). - URL: https://sibac.info/journal/student/30/108894(Accessed: 5.09.20). 15. Sierra, L., & Lopez, A. (2015). CLIL en la formaciуn inicial del profesorado de educaciуn infantil y primaria: la experiencia del CES Don Bosco. Revista Educaciуn y Futuro, 1, p. 1–23. 16. P. Kewara & D. Prabjandee (2018). CLIL Teacher Professional Development for Content Teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6(1), 93-108, p. 96. 17. Leshchenko М., Lavrysh Yu., Halatsyn К. (2018). The role of content and language integrated learning at Ukranian and Polish educational systems: challenges and implication. Advanced Education, Issue 9, p. 24. 18. Dafouz, E. & U. Smit (2017). “A sociolinguistic approach to the multifaceted roles of English in English- medium education in multilingual university settings” in A. llinares & T. Morton (eds.), Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL, Amsterdam/philadelphia: John Benjamins, p. 287-306. 19. Massler, U., Stotz, D., and Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42 (2), 137-150. жүктеу/скачать 3,76 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|