ISSN 1811-184X. Вестник ПГУ
серия
ХИМИКО - БИОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ. 2014. № 1
68
69
The surveys showed that the magnitude of losses in stored onion bulbs varied
considerably depending on the genotype of the onion breeding selection material
studied (Table). Due to the large scale of the data on the extent of the natural
decline in mass, damages from disease and storability of onion breeding selection
material the obtained characteristics conditionally were grouped.
Table 1 – Onion breeding selections by losses during 2012-2013 storage seasons
Breeding
selection
numbers
Breeding
combinations
Mean
onion
bulb
weight,
g
Total
losses,
%
Natural
decline
in
mass,
%
Losses
from
diseases от
болезней,
%
Storability,
%
ON 020
Me M1/08/2
103,8
16,7
4,8
11,9
83,3
ON 021
So M1/08/1
145,0
10,3
10,3
0,0
89,7
ON 022
So M1/08/2
114,3
10,0
10,0
0,0
90,0
ON 023
Av M1/08/1
119,4
8,9
8,9
0,0
91,1
ON 024
Av M1/08/2
65,0
20,9
9,6
11,3
79,1
ON 027
Tab M1/08/1
113,6
10,7
10,7
0,0
89,3
ON 072
Ig S1/09/3
101,4
22,7
9,9
12,9
77,3
ON 074
So S1/09/3
123,1
15,3
9,6
5,6
84,7
ON 076
Tal S1/09/6
120,0
10,0
10,0
0,0
90,0
ON 080
Me S1/09/3
96,0
10,4
10,4
0,0
89,6
ON 081
W202A 905-02 х Tal
73,1
18,5
6,8
11,6
81,5
ON 082
Tal S1/09/3
86,7
9,6
9,6
0,0
90,4
ON 104
W202B 906-02 х W449C
942-02
57,3
17,7
9,5
8,2
82,3
ON 105
W417B 913-02
91,1
9,8
9,8
0,0
90,2
ON 122
Me S1/09/2
156,3
37,0
16,0
21,0
63,0
ON 126
Ig S1/09/1
134,3
10,6
10,6
0,0
89,4
ON 129
Tal S1/09/2
102,0
15,7
15,7
0,0
84,3
ON 135
Av S1-08-4-S2
40,0
14,3
14,3
0,0
85,7
ON 136
Tab S1/08/1-S2/10/1
37,6
30,6
19,0
11,6
69,4
ON 142
W202A 905-02 х Tal) BC1
95,8
16,3
12,6
3,6
83,8
ON 143
(W420A 901-08 х Me)BC1
134,0
10,4
10,4
0,0
89,6
ON 144
W420A 901-08
54,7
25,0
15,1
10,0
75,0
ON 147
W420A 901-08 х Tal
83,3
16,9
12,0
4,9
83,1
ON 148
(W419A 915-02 х Tal)BC1
68,5
17,0
10,1
6,9
83,0
ON 149
(Gal-CMS 406-3 х Me)BC1
101,4
25,2
12,7
12,5
74,8
ON 151
W420A 901-08 х Me
83,1
10,5
10,5
0,0
89,5
ON 152
W4B 902-02
29,5
13,6
13,6
0,0
86,4
ON 154
W202A 905-02 х Me
75,7
16,8
10,4
6,4
83,2
ON 155
W420A 901-08 х Ig
97,1
11,8
11,8
0,0
88,2
ON 156
B8667 A 1489 х Me
86,3
15,1
10,4
4,7
84,9
ON 157
Gal-CMS 406-3 х Ig)BC1
88,3
9,4
9,4
0,0
90,6
ON 158
W417A 913-02 х Tal
75,9
29,8
14,7
15,0
70,2
ON 159
(W4A 901-02 х So)BC1
106,0
13,8
10,2
3,6
86,2
ON 160
(W202A 905-02 х So)BC1
72,0
9,7
9,7
0,0
90,3
ON 161
(W420A 901-08 х Tal)BC1
89,3
8,2
8,2
0,0
91,8
ON 162
W420A 901-08 х So
90,0
9,4
9,4
0,0
90,6
ON 163
W449C 942-02 (M1)
48,5
23,8
17,5
6,3
76,2
ON 164
W419A 915-02 х Me
51,3
9,8
9,8
0,0
90,2
ON 165
(W202A 905-02 х Ig)BC1
72,0
23,0
11,1
11,9
77,0
ON 166
SKI-1 A 302-3 х Me
72,5
17,2
17,2
0,0
82,8
ON 167
W419A 915-02
70,0
11,4
11,4
0,0
88,6
ON 168
W420A 901-08 х Av
100,9
18,1
10,3
7,8
81,9
ON 169
W417A 913-02
49,1
19,2
11,1
8,1
80,8
ON 170
W420A 901-08 х Tab
89,5
11,8
11,8
0,0
88,2
ON 172
W417A 913-02 х Me
85,0
8,4
8,4
0,0
91,6
ON 173
(W202A 905-02 х Me)BC1
90,0
9,0
9,0
0,0
91,0
ON 174
Tab x N/I
159,1
33,1
18,3
14,9
66,9
ON 176
SKI-1 B 302-4
37,3
19,7
15,9
3,8
80,3
ON 178
W419A 915-02 х Tal
67,9
10,5
10,5
0,0
89,5
ON 180
W420A 901-08 х Tal
116,7
2,9
2,9
0,0
97,1
ON 181
SKI-1 A 302-3 х Tal
67,7
12,5
12,5
0,0
87,5
ON 182
W419A 915-02 х Tab
114,0
8,8
8,8
0,0
91,2
ON 183
W202A 905-02
64,0
18,4
9,4
9,1
81,6
ON 184
B8667 A 1489 х Tab
92,5
9,5
9,5
0,0
90,5
ON 185
(Gal-CMS 406-3 х Tal)BC1
76,9
21,7
10,6
11,2
78,3
ON 189
W419B 916-02
52,2
4,3
4,3
0,0
95,7
ON 191
W4A 901-02 х Tal
111,7
24,1
9,0
15,2
75,9
ON 192
W417A 913-02 х Tab
140,0
8,6
8,6
0,0
91,4
ON 194
W4A 901-02
37,3
22,4
14,6
7,8
77,6
ON 195
W4A 901-02 х Me
90,9
5,0
5,0
0,0
95,0
ON 196
W202B 906-02
65,5
9,7
9,7
0,0
90,3
ON 197
W420B 902-08
43,0
14,0
14,0
0,0
86,0
ON 198
W202B 905-02
46,9
18,8
13,3
5,4
81,3
ON 200
W202A 905-02
60,0
11,1
11,1
0,0
88,9
ON 201
W202A 905-02 х Tab
99,3
8,6
8,6
0,0
91,4
ON 202
n/i х Tab
119,0
40,0
14,3
25,7
60,0
ON 208
n/i х Me
153,3
11,8
0,7
11,0
88,2
ON 209
(Ar S1-08-3)-(M1-10)
69,3
20,5
14,4
6,1
79,5
By the percentage of natural decline in mass the onion breeding selection
material were grouped as: 1 - high (>12,0%), 2 - medium (10,0-12,0%) and 3 -
low (<10,0%). Categories accepted on losses from diseases during storage were:
1 – high (>12,0%), 2 - medium (5,0-12,0%) and 3 - low (<5,0%). The storability
of onion entries were grouped as: 1 – high (>90,0%), 2 - medium (80,0-90,0%)
and 3 - low (<80,0%).
ISSN 1811-184X. Вестник ПГУ
серия
ХИМИКО - БИОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ. 2014. № 1
70
71
As shown in the table 1, high natural decline in mass (>12,0%) was observed
in 19 breeding selections of onion, in 22 selection numbers it was at a level of 10,0-
12,0%, low natural decline in mass (<10,0%) were noted in 27 onion accessions.
The lowest natural decline in mass were observed for onion breeding selections
ON208 – 0,7% and ON180 - 2,9%. The maximum natural decline in onion mass
were recorded for selection numbers ON136 - 19,0% and ON174 – 18,3%.
Of the 68 onion breeding selections investigated 37 have no visible infection
damages on onion bulbs. The maximum loss from diseases were observed in onion
breeding selections ON202 - 25,7% and ON122 - 21,0%; for 17 breeding selection
numbers the loss from diseases rated at the level of 3,6-10,0%.
Ultimately, the economic value of studied onion breeding selections was
integrated into indices to include mean onion bulb weight at 100g, storability
rate at >90%, natural decline in mass at <10% and the loss from diseases at
<10% during prolonged storage. The distinguished integrated indices of onion
bulb storability were documented for onion breeding selections ON022, ON023,
ON076, ON180, ON182 and ON192.
Conclusions
The results of the studies showed that the natural decline in mass, losses
from diseases and storability of onion bulbs varied considerably depending on
the genotype of the studied breeding selection material of onion.
LIST OF REFERENCES
1 Statistical Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 3 Series. Agriculture,
forestry and fisheries. Gross harvest of crops in the Republic of Kazakhstan for
2012.
2 Dospehov, B. A. Methods of field experience. – Moscow, 1985. – 415 p.
3 Kazakov, A. A. Onions. – L. Kolos, 1970. – 360 p.
4 Holz, G., Knox-Davies, P. S. Resistance of onion selections to Fusarium
oxysporum f. sp. cepae. //Phytophylactica, 1974, 6: 153-156.
5 Schroeder, t. D. Waters, and L. J. du Toit. Evaluation of Onion Cultivars
for Resistance to Enterobacter cloacae in Storage. // Plant Disease, 2010, Volume
94, 2: 236-243
6 Omveer Singe, A., N. Roy and R.P. Gupta. Storage rot in bulbs of onion
(Allium cepa L.) and its control. Pesticides, 1987,21 6: 43-47.
7 Kandoba, A. B. Grey neck rot dangerous disease of onion//Potatoes and
vegetables, 4: 1997. – C. 31.
8 Swee-Suak Ko, Jenn-Wen Huang, Jaw-Fen Wang, Subramanvam
Shannnigasundaram, Woo-Nang Chang. Evaluation of Onion Cultivars for
Resistance to Aspergillus niger, the Causal Agent of Black Mold//J. Amer. Soc.
Hort. Sci. 127(4):697-702. 2002.
9 Lazarev, A. M. Diseases of onion and garlic in storage // Plant Protection
and Quarantine, 2005, 8: 42.
KazRIPVG, Almaty
Material received on 10.04.2014.
Б. М. Амиров, Ж. С. Амирова. У. А. Манабаева, К. Р. Жасыбаева
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |