Лекциялар жинағы Мамандығы: 5В011900 «Шетел тілі: екі шетел тілі»
НЕДЕЛЯ 9 LECTURE 9. THEME: ACCENTUAL STRUCTURE OF ENGLISH WORDS
жүктеу/скачать 221,88 Kb.
|
лекция - теор ф
| НЕДЕЛЯ 9
LECTURE 9. THEME: ACCENTUAL STRUCTURE OF ENGLISH WORDS The numerous variations of English word stress are systematized in the typology of accentual structure of English words worked out by G.P.Torsuev. He classifies them according to the number of stressed syllables, their degree or character (the main and the secondary stress). The distribution of stressed syllables within the word accentual types forms accentual structures of words, e.g. the accentual type of words with two equal stresses may be presented bv several accentual structures: 'well-bred , 'absent-minded , or 'good-'looking . Accentual types and accentual structures are closely connected with the morphological type of words, with the number of syllables, the semantic value of the root and the prefix of the word. The accentual types are: I. This accentual type marks both simple and compound words. The accentual structures of this type may include two and more syllables, e.g. 'father, 'possibly, 'mother-in-law, 'gas-pipe. II. The accentual type is commonly realized in compound words, most of them are with separable prefixes, e.g. 'radio-active, 're'write, 'diso'bey. III. and IV. . The accentual types are met in initial compound abbreviations like 'U'S'A, 'U'S'S'R. V. . The type is realized both in simple and compound words, very common among compound words, e.g. 'hair-,dresser, 'sub,structure. VI. . The accentual type marks a great number of simple words and some compound words as well. In simple words the stresses fall onto: 1. the prefix and the root: maga’zine; 2. the root and the suffix: ,hospi'tality; 3, the prefix and the suffix: ,disorgani'zation. VII. . The type includes rather a small number of simple words with the separable prefixes, e.g. 'mis,represent. VIII. . The type is found in a very small number of words, usually simple words with the stresses on the prefix, the root and the suffix, e.g. ‘indi viduali'zation. IX. . The type is met in rare instances of compound words with separable prefixes, e.g. 'un'sea,worthy. X. . The type is represented by rare instances of simple and compound words, e.g. 'soda-,water, bottle. XI. . The type is found in rare instances of compound words consisting of the three components, e.g. ,ginger'beer-, bottle. The data given above suggest an idea of the great variability in the accentual structure of English words. The most widely spread among the enumerated accentual types are supposed to be Type I , Type II , Type V and Type VI . Each type includes varieties of definite accentual structures with different numbers of syllables and marks thousands of words. So the four of them cover the main bulk, of most common English words and are therefore most typical for the English vocabulary. As we may see, the typical feature of English accentual structure is its instability. There is a great number of words having variants of their accentual patterns. They may differ in: 1) number of stresses: USSR or ; 2) the place of stress: hospitable or ; 3) the degree of stress: individualization or . The variability of the word accentual structure is multiplied in connected speech. The accentual structure of words may be altered under the influence of rhythm, e.g. An 'unpolished 'stone. But: The 'stone was un'polished. 'Find 'page four'teen. But: We 'counted 'fourteen 'birds. The tempo of speech may influence the accentual pattern of words. With the quickening of the speed the carefulness of articulation is diminished, the vowels are reduced or elided, the secondary stress may be dropped, e.g. The 'whole organisation of the 'meeting was faulty. The variability of the English word accentual structure presents great difficulty for students of English. They should be well acquainted with the four most widely spread accentual types of words, mentioned above and be aware of the modifications of word accentual patterns influenced by rhythm and tempo in connected speech. The given examples of the accentual structure of words in connected speech show that the word stress is closely interrelated with sentence stress. We shall now try to see their similarity and difference. The demarcation of word stress and sentence stress is very important both from the theoretical and the practical viewpoint. Sentence stress usually falls on the very syllable of the word which is marked by word stress. Thus the accentual structure of the word predetermines the arrangement of stresses in a phrase. At the same time the stress pattern of a phrase is always conditioned by the semantic and syntactical factors. The words which usually become stressed in a phrase are notional words. They convey the main idea of the phrase, though any word including form words may be marked by sentence stress, if it has certain semantic value in the sentence. The common character of word stress and sentence stress is also observed in their rhythmical tendency to alternate stressed and unstressed syllables and pronounce them at approximately equal intervals. Now we should like to distinguish the notions of word stress and sentence stress. They are first of all different in their sphere of application as they are applied to different language units: word stress is naturally applied to a word, as a linguistic unit, sentence stress is applied to a phrase. Secondly, the distinction of the rhythmic structure of a word and a phrase is clearly observed in the cases when the word stress in notional words is omitted in a phrase, e.g. I 'don't think he is 'right. Or when the rhythmic structure of the isolated word does not coincide with that of a phrase, e.g. 'Fifteen. 'Room Fifteen. 'Fifteen 'pages. So in a speech chain the phonetic structure of a word obtains additional characteristics connected with rhythm, melody, and tempo. Though the sentence stress falls on the syllable marked by the word stress it is not realized in the stressed syllable of an isolated word but in a word within speech continuum. Since the spheres of word stress and sentence stress fall apart their functions are actually different. Sentence stress organizes a sentence into a linguistic unit, helps to form its rhythmic and intonation pattern, performs its distinctive function on the level of a phrase. In discussing accentual structure of English words we should turn now to the functional aspect of word stress. Word stress in a language performs three functions. I. Word stress constitutes a word, it organizes the syllables of a word into a language unit having a definite accentual structure, that is a pattern of relationship among the syllables; a word does not exist without the word stress. Thus the word stress performs the constitutive function. Sound continuum, becomes a phrase when it is divided into units organized by word stress into words. II. Word stress enables a person to identify a succession of syllables as a definite accentual pattern of a word. This function of word stress is known as identifiertory (or recognitive). Correct accentuation helps the listener to make the process of communis cation easier, whereas the distorted accentual pattern of words, misplaced word stresses prevent normal understanding. III. Word stress alone is capable of differentiating the meaning of words or their forms, thus performing its distinctive function. The accentual patterns of words or the degrees of word stress and their positions form oppositions, e.g. 'import – im'port, billow – be'low. VA.Vassilyev introduces the term "accenteme" for word stress as a suprasegmental phonological unit having different degrees and placement in a word (79). For instance the primary accenteme is opposed to the weak word accenteme (unstressed position), in 'import – im'port differentiating the noun from the verb. A.C.Gimson establishes three groups of words with identical spelling representing different parts of speech which are opposed by means of shifting of the stress. 1. A small group of words where the noun is differentiated from a verb by the opposition of the accentual pattern of the word alone, e.g. increase [‘ınkri:s] – [ın’kri:s] insult [‘ınsΛlt] – [ın’sΛlt] impress [‘ımpres] – [ım’pres] inlay [‘ınleı] – [ın’leı] 2. The second group where the shifting of the stress which means the change of the accentual pattern of the word may be or may not be accompanied by the reduction of the vowel in the unstressed syllable of the verbs, e.g. transport ['transport] – [træns'pat] or [trəns'port] torment ['to:rment] – [to:'ment] or [tə'ment] 3. The largest group of such pairs of words manifests the change of their accentual pattern together with the qualitative reduction of the unstressed vowel, e.g. combine ['kombaın] – [kəm’ba in] conduct ['kondΛkt] – [kan'dΛkt] contrast ['kontra:st] – [kan'tra:st] and many others. Oppositions of accentual types of words are also observed as a concomitant factor in word-formation in addition to suffixation. 1. e.g. 'organize – ,organization жүктеу/скачать 221,88 Kb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|