Top Magn Reson Imaging
. 1990;2(3):51-66.
10. Bhavsar Anil, Sadhna Verma. Anatomic Imaging of the Prostate: Re-
view article.
BioMed Research International.
2014;Article ID 728539:9.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/728539
11. Shaish H, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB. Prostate MR Imaging: An Up-
date.
Radiol Clin North Am
. 2017;55(2):303-320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2016.10.011
12. Matsugasumi T, Fujihara A, Ushijima S, Kanazawa M, Yamada Y, Shi-
raishi T, Hongo F, Kamoi K, Okihara K, de Castro Abreu AL, Oishi M,
Shin T, Palmer S, Gill IS, Ukimura O. Morphometric analysis of pros-
tate zonal anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging: impact on age-
related changes in patients in Japan and the USA.
BJU Int
.
2017;120(4):497-504.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13823
13. Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Jones JS, Kattan MW, Klein EA,
Hamdy F, Neal D, Donovan J, Parekh DJ, Ankerst D, Bartsch G,
Klocker H, Horninger W, Benchikh A, Salama G, Villers A, Freed-
land SJ, Moreira DM, Vickers AJ, Lilja H, Steyerberg EW. Importance
of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for
Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate bi-
opsy collaborative group.
World J Urol
. 2012;30(2):149-155.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0804-y
14. Lee JH, Lee SW. Impact of prostate volume on erectile dysfunction and
premature ejaculation.
Aging Male
. 2016;19(2):106-110.
https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2016.1150993
15. Aaron L, Franco OE, Hayward SW. Review of Prostate Anatomy and
Embryology and the Etiology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Urol
Clin North Am
. 2016;43(3):279-288.
https://doi.org/0.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.012
16. Röthke M, Blondin D, Schlemmer HP, Franiel T. PI-RADS Classifi-
cation: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate.
Clin Men’s Health
.
2013;4:30-38.
17. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR
guidelines 2012.
Eur Radiol.
2012;22:746-757.
https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00330-011-2377-y
18. Medved M, Soylu-Boy FN, Karademir I, et al. High-resolution diffu-
sion-weighted imaging of the prostate.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2014;203:85-90.
19. Korobkin AS, Shariya MA, Chaban AS, Voskanvan GA, Vinarov AZ.
Magnetic resonance semiotics of prostate cancer according to the
PI-RADS classification. The clinical diagnostic algorithm of a study.
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol
. 2015;(4):18-28.
Поступила 10.09.18
ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |