Английский язык для юристов

Просмотрите образцы иска в гражданский суд США и образец иска в Арбитражный суд

жүктеу/скачать 3,06 Mb.

Pdf көрінісі

бет	269/298
Дата	25.01.2023
өлшемі	3,06 Mb.
	#62776
түрі	Учебник

1 ... 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 ... 298

Байланысты:
Учебник для бакалавров

COUNT I - Strict Liability-Defect in Design - Product Liability

5. Просмотрите образцы иска в гражданский суд США и образец иска в Арбитражный суд
РФ. Изучите и сравните форму и структуру. Определите, в чем состоит сходство и
различие по форме и содержанию иска в гражданский суд США и иска в Арбитражный суд
РФ.

Образец 1.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND
SANDY JENKINS - Plaintiff
v
CONNECTIVE ENERGY- Defendant
*
*
*
*
*
CASE NO.:
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Sandy Jenkins, by and through their undersigned attorneys, Ronald V. Miller, Jr., and
Miller &Zois, LLC, bring suit against Defendant Connective Energy and states as follows:
1. Plaintiff is a resident of Mt. Carmel, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Connective Energy carries on regular and substantial business in Baltimore City,
Maryland.
3. On July 3, 2004 at 11:05 p.m., at 13601 Philadelphia SB Avenue in Ocean City, Maryland,
Plaintiff suffered serious and permanent injuries as the result of an explosion that occurred on
Defendant’s electrical pole (Connective pole 62496/95862 located on the bay side of 135th Street).
4. The explosion caused a cylinder measuring two inches long and 3/8 inches wide to become
imbedded in Plaintiff’s right forearm.
COUNT I - Strict Liability-Defect in Design - Product Liability
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraph 1.
5. Defendant participated in sale and maintenance of a product.
6. Defendant maintained, installed and assembled the product which contained a defective
condition because the design was defective and unsafe.

268
7. This design defect made the product unreasonably dangerous.
8. The system as assembled by Connective remained unchanged and was in the same condition
at the time of the injury hereafter alleged.
9. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s installation and maintenance of the
defectively designed product, Plaintiff sustained permanent injury.

жүктеу/скачать 3,06 Mb.

Достарыңызбен бөлісу:

1 ... 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 ... 298