Учебно-методическое пособие для студентов специальности «Дизайн»



Pdf көрінісі
бет86/97
Дата08.06.2023
өлшемі0,79 Mb.
#99865
түріУчебно-методическое пособие
1   ...   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   ...   97
Байланысты:
Sugonyako

Bell J. C. Perspective // The Dictionary of Art / еd. by J. Turner. Vol. 24: Grove’s Dic-
tionaries Inc. New York, 1996. P. 485–490. 
Text 8 
The space created by means of linear perspective is closely related to the 
space created by photography, the medium we accept as representing “real” 
space with the highest degree of accuracy. The picture drawn in perspective 
and the photograph both employ a monocularthat is, one-eyed, point of view 
that defines the picture plane as the base of a pyramid, the apex of which is the 
single lens or eye. Our actual vision, however, is binocular. 
Painters can make up for the distortions in ways that photographers can-
not. If the artist portrayed in Durer’s woodcut “Draftsman Drawing a Reclin-
ing Nude” were to draw exactly what he sees before his eyes, he would end up 
with a composition not unlike that achieved by Phillip Pearlstein in his water-
color “Model on Dogon Chair, Leg Crossed” (1979), a nude whose feet and 
calves are much larger than the rest of her body. Pearlstein deliberately paints 
exactly what he sees, in order to draw our attention to certain formal repeti-
tions and patterns in the figure. Note, for instance, the way that the shape of 
the nearest foot repeats the shape of the shadowed area beneath the model’s 
buttocks and thigh. But Andrea Mantegna was not interested at all in depicting 
“The Dead Christ” (1501) with disproportionately large feet. Such a represen-
tation would make comic or ridiculous a scene of high seriousness and conse-
quence. It would be indecorousThus Mantegna has employed foreshortening 
in order to represent Christ’s body. In foreshortening, the dimensions of the 
closer extremities are adjusted in order to make up for the distortion created by 
the point of view. 
As we saw in the Pearlstein watercolor, modern artists often intentionally 
violate the rules of perspective to draw the attention of the viewer to elements 
of the composition other than its verisimilitudeor the apparent “truth” of its 
representation of reality. In his large painting “Harmony in Red” (1908– 
1909), Henri Matisse has almost completely eliminated any sense of three-
dimensionality by uniting the different spaces of the painting in one large field 
of uniform color and design. The wallpaper and the tablecloth are made of the 
same fabric. The chair at the left seems abnormally large, as if very close to 
our point of view, yet its back stands at the same height as the chair between 
the table and the wall. Shapes are repeated throughout: The spindles of the 
chairs and the tops of the decanters echo one another, as do the maid’s hair 


128
and the white foliage of the large tree outside the window. The tree's trunk re-
peats the arabesque design on the tablecloth directly below it. Even the win-
dow can be read in two ways: It could, in fact, be a window opening to the 
world outside, or it could be the corner of a painting, a framed canvas lying 
flat against the wall. In traditional perspective, the picture frame functions as a 
window. Here the window has been transformed into a frame. 
What one notices most of all in Paul Cezanne’s “Mme. Cezanne in a Red 
Armchair” is its very lack of spatial depth. Although the arm of the chair 
seems to project forward on the right, on the left the painting is almost totally 
flat. The blue flower pattern on the wallpaper seems to float above the spiraled 
end of the arm, as does the tassel that hangs below it, drawing the wall far 
forward into the composition. The line that establishes the bottom of the base-
board on the left seems to ripple on through Mme. Cezanne’s dress. But most 
of all, the assertive vertical stripes of that dress, which appear to rise straight 
up from her feet parallel to the picture plane, deny Mme. Cezanne her lap. It is 
almost as if a second, striped vertical plane lies between her and the viewer. 
By this means Cezanne announces that it is not so much the accurate represen-
tation of the figure that interests him as it is the design of the canvas and the 
activity of painting itself, the play of its pattern and color. 
Sayre H. M. A World of Art // Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River. 3
rd
 ed. New 
Jersey, 2000. P. 103–106.


Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   ...   97




©emirsaba.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет