128
and the white foliage of the large tree outside the window. The tree's trunk re-
peats the arabesque design on the tablecloth directly below it. Even the win-
dow can be read in two ways: It could, in fact, be a
window opening to the
world outside, or it could be the corner of a painting, a framed canvas lying
flat against the wall. In traditional perspective, the picture frame functions as a
window. Here the window has been transformed into a frame.
What one notices most of all in Paul Cezanne’s “Mme. Cezanne in a Red
Armchair” is its very lack of spatial depth. Although the arm of the chair
seems to
project forward on the right, on the left the painting is almost totally
flat. The blue flower pattern on the wallpaper seems to float above the spiraled
end of the arm, as does the tassel that hangs below it, drawing the wall far
forward into the composition. The line that establishes the bottom of the base-
board on the left seems to ripple on through Mme. Cezanne’s dress. But most
of all, the assertive vertical stripes of that dress, which appear
to rise straight
up from her feet parallel to the picture plane, deny Mme. Cezanne her lap. It is
almost as if a second, striped vertical plane lies between her and the viewer.
By this means Cezanne announces that it is not so much the accurate represen-
tation of the figure that interests him as it is the design
of the canvas and the
activity of painting itself, the play of its pattern and color.
Sayre H. M. A World of Art // Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River. 3
rd
ed. New
Jersey, 2000. P. 103–106.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: