Text 15
It should go without saying that modernism, expressly devoted to divorc-
ing art from literature and to rejecting the parental control exercised by the
academies, would also renounce the genres. Walter Pater’s monitory assertion
that “all art constantly aspires to the condition of music”, in an essay on the
paintings of Giorgione, was echoed by many artists of the modern movement.
Yet even if we leave aside those who made a point of adhering to the tradi-
tional categories and look only at the work of artists associated with the avant-
garde, we find that the genres survive for the artist as matrices controlling not
only content but also form and, for the spectator, as a system of signals guid-
ing us in our approach to works that sometimes lack identifiable images. It is
suggested that Abstract art relies particularly on the genres – so much so that it
would seem the system, far from imposing artificial divisions on an activity
routinely valued for its freedom, reflects inalienably common human experi-
ence and our grasp upon it.
Since the later 18
th
century the genres have often been interbred, mostly
with the intention of enhancing the meaning or communicative weight of the
lower categories. The way to achieve this was to introduce into them unmis-
takable elements of history painting’s strategies and mien. An aspiration “to
the condition of istoria” typifies much in Romantic art and since; the problem
is to show that this parody of Pater’s dictum is not actually contradictory of it.
It was in fact Pater’s generation that made it possible to adopt both. Upgrading
139
genre subjects to the level of history by means of manner, scale, and symbol-
ism provides striking examples of the promotion process before that time. For
obvious reasons it was condemned by the conservative majority of artists and
public whereas the grafting of history elements on to the portrait did not.
A famous instance is Millet’s “The Sower” (1850): a typical peasant and a
typical task but on the physical and spiritual scale of the Michelangelo, so that
the image brings with it not only echoes of medieval and early Renaissance
representations of the seasons but also, through its epic presence, thoughts of
life and death as well as of the dignity of labor and of the common man.
Baudelaire asked for an art celebrating modern man in his increasingly normal
habitat, the city, but it was some time before urban man found epic celebra-
tion. The quick visual response of the Impressionist was not suited to epic
statements but the Neo-Impressionists showed a positive inclination to monu-
mentality and Seurat’s masterpiece, “Sunday Afternoon on the Island of the
Grande Jatte” (1886), may be seen as the first fully-fledged instance of the
type – Courbet’s “A Burial at Ornans (1850), a generation earlier, offers a fit-
ting country-town comparison. A triumphant 20
th
-century example is Leger’s
“The Constructors” (1950): the valuable but ordinary activity of ordinary men
(“worse than ourselves”) is made into an heroic image by the use of scale, ide-
alized rather than detailed and individualized representation, and composi-
tional echoes of a much-used theme in religious history painting, always an
occasion for particularly affecting images, the Deposition of Christ. George
Grosz stated his wish to produce “modern history painting”, and his “Pillars of
Society (1926) shows caricature of a genre sort adapted to istoria purpose, and
it is reminiscent not only of the work of Hogarth – to whom Grosz specifically
pointed – but also to the Northern tradition of the young Christ among the
Doctors and its inverted reprise, later in the story, in “Christ before Pilate or
Ecce Homo”. The Symbolists, in the 1880s and 1890s prized suggestion and
mystery above the more direct instruction associated with epic poetry and is-
toria, encouraging artists to explore a level of human experience known to us
all and recognized since Romanticism as a source for artistic invention: the
level of dream and fantasy and of unformed intimations all the more poignant
for lack of verbal definition. This was Pater’s generation. His praise fur Gior-
gione reminds us that elements of irrational communication, perhaps inescap-
able in the visual arts, had played a major role in his art and that of artists who
may be seen as his successors: Titian, Rubens, Rembrandt, Delacroix, all re-
nowned for a markedly personal vein of expression. The late 19
th
-century’s
belief in the efficacy of imprecise meaning, conveyed by images and also by
the appeal of color, tone, and line, brilliantly expressed in Gauguin’s “Where
Do We Come From?” was strengthened by scientific investigation into the ef-
140
fective role of visual stimuli. This meant that a 20
th
-century painter like Kand-
insky could erase even the vestiges of recognizable imagery from his works
and reasonably claim to communicate at a superrational level, like music and
like the mystical doctrines to which he and others were drawn by Theosophy
and similar spiritualist movement.
Abstract painting did not elude the pull of tradition and can be shown to
owe much of its efficacy to our shared conditioning by established types. To
stress this association is not to question the validity or the originality of Ab-
stract art but, again, to point to constants that reflect human processes. Many
spectators have sensed formal conventions belonging to still life and to land-
scape when confronting Abstract compositions. It is at least possible that the
deeply religious effect exercised by Rothko’s famous two-part compositions
depends on echoes struck in us of paintings of the “Transfiguration” and other
scenes setting a supernatural event above a terrestrial plane. And the efficacy
of Albers’ long “Homage to the Square” series, throughout which he em-
ployed the same geometrical arrangement, derives from its echoing the rich
tradition of the head-and-shoulders portrait in the way the High Renaissance,
especially Raphael, established it, strongly constructed and monumental yet at
the same time intimate. Such suggestions are of course speculative but there
can be no doubt that, as formal types associated with particular dispositions of
solids and spaces, and also as vehicles of meaning, the genres continue to ex-
ercise some benign control over art, often at the subconscious level.
Lynton N. The genres in modern art // The Encyclopedia of Visual Art. Vol. 10: Ency-
clopaedia Britannica International. London, 1994. P. 92–95.
141
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |