Болат мырзалиев
жүктеу/скачать 14,41 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| Conclusion
In our opinion, modern psychological science requires what the founders of deep psychology de- cided to do at the time – to show a person another side of their mental life that is ignored and under- estimated by them. If the enlightened nineteenth century, bowing to reason and the highest achievements of the human spirit, turned away from the unconscious manifestations of the soul, considering them neg- ative, in the twentieth century there was a long ne- glect of just the healthy components of the psyche, arguments about which often seemed too banal, abstract and leading away from understanding the true nature of man. Psychopathology was the starting point for most fundamental psychological theories of per- sonality. This led to the formation of empirically based ideas about the suffering soul, neurotic personality, split «I», to the construction of complex and claim- ing to be universal models of human existence, full of inevitable deep contradictions. It was only in the second half of the twentieth century that a well-defined and theoretically justified transition to the humanistic model of personality was outlined. In contrast to adaptive personality models, many of which focus on errors and failures of adaptation, humanistic psychology is a psychology focused on the study of healthy and creative people, on under- standing the constructive, creative manifestations of human nature, which is its scientific specificity. In Russian psychological science, the rise of re- search interest in the field of health psychology falls on the last decade of the XX century. Currently, there are many productive ideas and concepts that indicate the need for a comprehensive approach to the study of human beings and emphasize the importance of spiritual, moral and value-semantic determinants of mental health of the individual. жүктеу/скачать 14,41 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|