Ключевые слова: Исторические письменное наследие, письменные источники, тюркская культура,
старокипчакский язык, этнические группы, морфологический строй тюркских языков.
Summary S.R. Boranbaev – Rector principal of Regional social-innovation university,
philological scinces doctor., associate professor., sandybai60@mail.ru
N.M. Nurlibaev – Vice-Rector of scince and international connection of university Shymkent,
Candidate of philological scinces., execute of associate professor., nnmank@mail.ru Scintific theoretical bases of lexical similaritiesin Turkic languages Insufficiency of attention of Turkology to written monuments of the early and late Middle Ages demands deep
studies of scientific theoretical forms by method of the historical and comparative analysis, traditionally used in a
Turkology. The given subject is actual that traces a historical genetic linkage of Old Kipshak and Kazakh languages,
investigating a row written the Old Kipshak of monuments, carries out complex comparative work on material of
lexical fund of modern Kazakh language, reveals continuity of these languages by the analysis of phonological, lexical,
morphological circles as a result of system uniformity of languages; defines the role of Old Kipshak and cultural -
historical importance in formation of the Kazakh language, historical and genetic continuity of both languahes. The
religion, culture, housekeeping of ethnos, undoubtedly, reflects modern language. Therefore the close interrelation of
history of a language with history of the people assumes close study of a glotto genesis of a language groups with
ethnogenetical problems.
Keywords: Historical written heritage, written sources, Turkic culture, an aincient kipchak language, ethnic groups,
the morphological structure of the Turkic languages.