Учебное пособие для специальностей «Переводческое дело» и«Иностранный язык: два иностранных языка»



Pdf көрінісі
бет36/162
Дата29.09.2024
өлшемі1,38 Mb.
#146095
түріУчебное пособие
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   162
Байланысты:
New Боргуль Н.М. Пособие по основам теории изучаемого языка

§ 2. The adjective 
In the course of the ME period the adjective underwent greater simplifying 
changes than any other part of speech. It lost all grammatical categories except the 
degrees of comparison. 
In OE the adjective was declined to show gender, case and number of the noun it 
modified; it had a five-case paradigm and two types of declension (weak and strong).
By the end of the OE period the agreement of the adjective with the noun had 
become looser and in the course of early ME it was practically lost. Though the 
grammatical categories of the adjective reflected those of the noun, most of them 
disappeared even before the noun lost the respective distinctions.
The degrees of comparison is the only set of forms which the adjective has 
preserved through all historical periods. However, the endings used to build up the 
forms of the degrees of comparison have considerably altered.
In OE the forms of the comparative and the superlative degrees were built by 
adding the suffixes 
–ra 
and 
–est/-ost, 
to the form of the positive degree. Sometimes 
affixation was accompanied by an interchange of the root-vowel; a few adjectives 
had suppletive forms.
In ME the degrees of comparison could be built in the same way, only the 
suffixes had been weakened to 
–er, -est 
and the interchange of the root-vowel was 
less common than before. 
The most important innovation in the adjective system in the ME period was the 
growth of analytical forms of the degrees of comparison. 
The new system of comparisons emerged in ME, but the ground for it had 
already been prepared by the use of the OE adverbs 
mā, bet, betst, swī
ƥ
or 
– „more‟, 
„better‟, „to a greater degree‟ with adjectives and participles. It is remarkable that in 
ME, when the phrases with ME 
more 
and 
most 
became more and more common, they 
were used with all kinds of adjectives, regardless of the number of syllables and were 
even preferred with mono- and disyllabic words. 


37 
§ 3. The verb 
Unlike the morphology of the noun and the adjective, which has become much 
simpler in the course of history, the morphology of the verb displayed two distinct 
tendencies of development: it underwent considerable simplifying changes which 
affected the synthetic forms and became far more complicated owing to the growth of 
new analytical forms and new grammatical categories. 
All types of verbs existing in OE (strong, weak preterite-present) were preserved 
in ME. However, owing to certain linguistic factors a number of OE strong verbs 
weakened in ME and vice versa: some of the weak verbs became strong. In each of 
these verb types we find numerous changes. 
The OE prefix 
ʒe-
was reduced to 
y-
. This prefix was mostly found in the second 

Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   162




©emirsaba.org 2024
әкімшілігінің қараңыз

    Басты бет