Устойчивое развитие: язык, межкультурная коммуникация
жүктеу/скачать 5,1 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
COLLECTION of Сonferences XXIV «Akhanov readings» 2021
| Conclusion. The role of assessment is paramount in any type of instruction. That is why each
educator tries to implement the most effective strategies into their classrooms. As distance education is being implemented not only in universities, but also in elementary, middle and high schools, most of the teachers in our country struggling with the choice of most suitable assessment strategies. As alternative assessment strategies and tools allow learners learn without anxiety, making learning process enjoyable it is possible use them on ongoing basis. However, it is not possible to use them all the time. In case of summative assessment, which is used for final evaluation in the end of each term it is better to use traditional assessment tools such as standardized tests or multiple-choice tests with the help of technologies as it can guarantee higher reliability and validity. References 1. Cowan, J. Designing assessment to enhance student learning. -2005 2. Law, B. & Eckes, M. Assessment and ESL. Peguis publishers: Manitoba,learning. -1995 3. Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., Jones, B.F., Raack, L., & Tinzmann, M.B. Why should assessment be based on a vision of learning [online document] NCREL, Oak Brook: IL. Available online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/assess.htm -1990 4. Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. What does research say about assessment? NCREL, Oak Brook. Available online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/4assess.htm - 1991 5. Ioannou-Georgiou, S. Assessing young learners. Oxford University Press. - 2003 6. Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into practice 55(2) -2016 153-159. 7. Guo, W. Y., & Yan, Z. Formative and summative assessment in Hong Kong primary schools: students’ attitudes matter. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 26(6) - 2019 pp 675-699. 8. Han, B. O. Traditional vs. Modern methods of assessing English. Studia Universitatis 2005 9. Reeves, T. C. Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Educational Computing Research 3(1) - 2000 pp. 101-111. 10. Bailey, K. M. Learning about language assessment: dilemmas, decisionjs, and directions. Heinle& Heinle: US. - 1998 11. Simonson M., Smaldino, S, Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. Assessment for distance education (ch 11). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall. - 2000 12. Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. What does research say about assessment? NCREL, Oak Brook. Available online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/4assess.htm - 1991 13. Nouwens, F. & Towers, S. Assessment in distance education. Cited in S. Dixon, G. Lefoe, F. Nouwens and S. Wills (eds) Teaching at a distance [CD-ROM]. PAGE: Melbourne. Available online: http://cedir.uow.edu.au/programs/flexdel/resources/AssessmentDistEd.html - 1997 14. Tarouco, L. & Hack, L. New tools for assessment in distance education [online document]. Available online: http://www.pgie.ufrgs.br/webfolioead/artigo1.html 15. Kibby, M. Assessing students online. The University of New Castle. Retrieved March 3, 2002, from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/discipline/sociol-anthrop/staff/kibbymarj/online/assess.html 16. Meyen, E.L., Aust, R. J., Bui, Y. N., & Isaacson, R. Assessing and monitoring student progress in an e-learning personnel preparation environment. Teacher education and special education, 25 (2). - 2005 pp187-198. МРНТИ 16.31.51 жүктеу/скачать 5,1 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|