Болат мырзалиев
жүктеу/скачать 14,41 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
Наука и жизнь Казахстана 4 6 2020
| Conclusion
According to the theory of V.N. Komissarov, the equivalence of the translation lies in the maximum identity of all levels of the content of the texts of the original and the translation. Let’s consider transliteration. Transliteration is a foreign word borrowing, which is then depicted in letters in the letters of the target language, and in oral speech is pronounced according to the pronunciation skills of translating language. Many words formed by this method have firmly entered the language of translation. So, from German into Russian, such words as штрейкбрехер (Streikbrecher), рейсфедер (Reissfeder) and many other words, and from English – almost all computer terminology. E. Roganova notes that along with full transliter- ation, a partial one is also used. At the same time, the foreign word is not completely transferred un- changed into the Russian language, only its main significant part is transliterated and word-forming suffixes of the Russian language are added to it, for example: programmer – программист, analyst – аналитик, der Gestapomann – гестаповец, etc. [Roganova Z.E, 1961. – 304 p.] According to L.K. Latyshev, translating by means of transliteration and the subsequent introduction of a word created in this way into speech usage are not always necessary and justified. Of course, bor- rowed words, which already have well-established analogues in the language, to some extent clog the translating language. In Russian, these are such “ex- cessive” borrowings as: transparent (clear), retailer (retail trade network), permanent (constant), pro- long (extend), mass media (media), replica (exact copy), etc. [Latyshev L. K, 2003, 193p.] Transliteration is necessary when it is important to observe the lexical brevity of a designation that corresponds to its familiarity in the original lan- guage, and at the same time emphasize the specific- ity of the thing or concept called if there is no exact correspondence in the language of translation. The reliability is an advantage of transliteration as a way to translate equivalent vocabulary. REFERENCES: 1. Ya.I. Retsker “Theory of Translation and Translation Practice”, Moscow, – International Relations, 2004 2. I.V. Arnold, “The Stylistics of Modern English,” L., – Enlightenment, 1981. 3. Vlakhov S., Florin S. Untranslatable in translation. – M .: International Relations, 1980 4. Altaybaeva D. World translation. Tutorial. – Astana, 2008 .—128p. 5. V.A. Kukharenko “Interpretation of the text”, L., – Enlightenment, 1979 6. Komissarov V.N. Translation theory. – M .: VSH, 1990 .-- 251 p. 7. A. O. Ivanov, Equivalent vocabulary, Publishing house of St. Petersburg University, 2006 8. Catford J.C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation, Oxford University Press, 1978 9. Roganova Z.E. A manual for translation from German into Russian – M .: Publishing house of literature in foreign languages, 1961. – 304 p. 10. Latyshev L. K., Semenov A. L. Translation: theory, practice and teaching methodology: Uch. pos. M .: Publishing. Center “Academy”, 2003, 193p. 177 ҚАЗА ҚСТАННЫ Ң ҒЫЛЫМЫ МЕН Ө М ІР І • НАУКА И ЖИЗНЬ КАЗАХСТАНА • SCIENCE AND LIFE OF KA ZAKHST AN жүктеу/скачать 14,41 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|