Доклады казахской академии образования Ежеквартальный журнал издается с 2008 года
жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| research, between history and the knowledge must be discarded"
1i, p. 388 . In the end, though, it comes down to "recognizing the element of tradition in historical research and inquiring into its hermeneutic productivity" 1j, p. 389 . This leads Gadamer do employ reasoning which considers understanding within the context of a hermeneutic condition of belonging to a certain tradition. The hermeneutical rule requires that the whole should be understood in terms of the detail and the detail in terms of the whole. However, it is a circular structure – a circular structure of understanding within the framework of the formal relation between the whole and the part. Understanding, according to Heidegger, is defined by the anticipatory movement of fore-understanding. And that disavows formalism, since it is a matter of a dynamic process of interplay between the tradition and the interpreter, a game situation. Anticipations of meaning do not have subjective basis. The ground on which they occur is a tradition-based commonality, which is not a precondition, but is self-produced by the individual connected with tradition. Therefore, Gadamer thinks that "the circle of understanding is 215 not a "methodological" circle, but describes an element of the ontological structure of understanding" 1k, p. 404 . Hence follows the hermeneutical implication of "fore-conception of completeness" concerning meaning, "that only what really constitutes a unity of meaning is intelligible" 1l, p. 404 . Completeness guides understanding. In terms of content, understanding itself explicates three points: 1. understanding the nature of things, 2. understanding and discarding other’s opinion, 3. agreeing on and establishing the truth. This mechanism classifies the hermeneutic rules. Firstly, there comes fore-conception. It is derived from experience ("having-to-do") with the thing. It determines the unity of meaning. It also determines call the "fore-conception of completeness". Secondly, there is the sense of belonging. It is derived from tradition and is fulfilled through the commonality of prejudices. The starting position of hermeneutics is: the understander is related to the essence of the subject matter, the essence of the subject matter comes through inheritance, inheritance comes from tradition, hence the understander attains unity with tradition. A faculty of the hermeneutical conscious: inability to relate to the essence of the subject matter through unquestioned singleness - this singleness characterizes the continuity of tradition. The implication, Gadamer’s conclusion: "Hermeneutic work is based on a polarity of familiarity and strangeness […] It is in the play between the traditionary text's strangeness and familiarity to us, between being a historically intended, distanced object and belonging to a tradition. The true жүктеу/скачать 2,64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|