References
1. Mailybaeva, G. S., Nurgaliyevа, S. A., Zhexembayeva, Z. R., Zholumbayeva, R. M., & Utegulov, D. E.
(2018). The efficiency of the education system in Kazakhstan: Programme for International Student Assessment
(PISA). Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (85), 600-626.
2. OECD, O. (2018). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. A Series
of Concept Notes.
3. Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2014). 16 Cognitive Strategy Instruction. Handbook of research on
reading comprehension, 347.
4. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies for discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic
Press
5. Bouchard, M. (2005). Comprehension strategies for English language learners. Teaching.
6. O’malley, J. M., O’Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second
language acquisition. Cambridge university press.
7. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. Heinle & heinle
Publishers.;.
8. Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s
academic performance. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
9. Phakiti, A. (2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL
reading test performance. Melbourne papers in language testing, 1(1), 53–96.
10. Mitsea, E., & Drigas, A. (2019). A Journey into the Metacognitive Learning Strategies. International
Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 15(14), 4–20.
11. Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning1. Applied linguistics, 19(4),
515–537.
12. Miller, P. H. (1985). Metacognition and attention. In Instructional Practices (pp. 181-221). Academic
Press.
13. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351–
371.
14. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental
inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
15. Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of
Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance.
16. Wall, T. F. (2015). The transferability of higher order cognitive skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 174, 233–238.
17. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education:
Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, 36(1–2), 111-139.
18. Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students.
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.
19. Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and
teaching reading comprehension. What research has to say about reading instruction, 4, 286-314
20. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal
of education, 189(1-2), 107-122
21. Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC
Digest.
22. Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read. (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production.
Psychological Review, 83, 363-394.
24. Kline, P., & Meyer-Brown, N. BrainWare® Safari: Cognitive Skills Development and Learning to Read.
25. Malekzadeh, B., & Bayat, A. (2015). The effect of mind mapping strategy on comprehending implicit
information in EFL reading texts. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(3), 81-90.
26. Khansir, A. A., & Dashti, J. G. (2014). The Effect of Question-Generation Strategy on Iranian EFL
Learners’ Reading Comprehension Development. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 38-45.
27. Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension
of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 222-234.
The effect of cognitive and meta-cognitive strategy instruction on academic performance
137
№ 1(134)/2021
ВЕСТНИК Евразийского национального университета имени Л.Н. Гумилева.
Серия Педагогика. Психология. Социология
BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociology Series
28. Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2015). Improving students’ science text comprehension through
metacognitive self-regulation when applying learning strategies. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 313-346.
29. National Reading Panel (US). (2000). National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: an Evidence-
based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
30. Tavakoli, H., & Koosha, M. (2016). The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading
comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian University EFL students.
31. Gurses, M. O., & Adiguzel, O. C. (2013). The Effect of Strategy Instruction Based on the Cognitive
Academic Language Learning Approach over Reading Comprehension and Strategy Use. Journal of education
and learning, 2(2), 55-68.
32. Pei, L. (2014). Does metacognitive strategy instruction indeed improve Chinese EFL learners’ reading
comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness?. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5),
1147.
33. Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension
Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129.
34. Rubin, J. (2013). Teaching language-learning strategies. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-5.
35. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual
review of applied linguistics, 25, 112-130.
36. Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions.
Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 4(3), 124-132.
37. Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A Review of Studies on Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies
in Teaching Reading Comprehension for ESL/EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94-111.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |