Отношений и мировых языков имени абылай хана центр корееведения
жүктеу/скачать 3,47 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
|
КАЗАХСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ И МИРОВЫХ ЯЗЫКОВ ИМЕНИ АБЫЛАЙ ХАНА ЦЕНТР КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЯ КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЕ КАЗАХСТАНА выпуск 2
Алматы, 2014
“This journal was supported by the Academy of Korean Studies Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (AKS-2012-BBZ-2103)”
КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЕ КАЗАХСТАНА выпуск 2(2014)
УДК 811.531 ББК 81.2-Кор. К 66
Казахстан Ответственный редактор: Чан Ходжон, Ph.D., профессор КазУМОиМЯ, Казахстан
Ён Чехун, Ph.D., Лондонский университет SOAS, Великобритания Ким А.С., к.ф.н., доцент КазУМОиМЯ, Казахстан Курбанов О.С., д.и.н., профессор СПбГУ, Россия Пек Тхехён, к.и.н., профессор Бишкекского Гуманитарного Университета, Кыргызстан Сон Ёнхун, Ph.D., профессор Университета иностранных языков Хангук, Республика Корея Сон Хянгын, Ph.D., профессор Пусанского университета иностранных языков, Республика Корея Ужкенов Е.М., к.и.н., доцент КазУМОиМЯ, Казахстан
Ким У.А. Ем И.Э. Свиридова В.А.
В данном сборнике представлены статьи по различным областям корееведения. Они расположены в алфавитном порядке по четырём разделам и публикуются на русском, корейском, английском и казахском языках. Данное издание выпущено при поддержке Академии Корееведения Республики Корея. Книга рассчитана на широкий круг читателей – студентов, магистрантов, аспирантов, докторантов, преподавателей, ученых, исследователей, а также тех, кто интересуется Кореей и проблемами корееведения.
Содержание
i СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
языке ............................................................................................................................ 16
корейском языке ......................................................................................................... 24
Азии ............................................................................................................................. 33
кино) ............................................................................................................................. 39
заимствования в южнокорейском языке .................................................................. 45
누르갈리예바 아이굴. 한국어와 러시아어 신체 관련 관용어의 비교 – '머리'를 중심으로 ...................................................................................................................... 63
조차 [-то, -ккачжи, -мачжǒ, -чжочха] «даже, тоже, также» и их роль в коммуникативных отношениях ................................................................................. 72
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ВОРОНИНА Л.А. Проблемы в обучении лексике студентов-лингвистов, изучающих корейский язык как второй иностранный ............................................ 91
강성규. 서시베리아 대학교에서의 한국어 강좌 현황 ........................................... 101 김영경. 외국어로서의 한국어 교육에서 효과적인 한국어 말하기 학습지도 ...... 109
занятиях по корейскому языку (на материале лексики из текстов по архитектуре) .................................................................................................................................... 134
безэквивалентной лексики в процессе обучения корейскому языку .................... 140
корейского языка ...................................................................................................... 149
방정식. 한국어의 효과적 학습을 위한 드라마 활용하기 ...................................... 155 장호종. 중앙아시아 한국학의 현황과 네트워크의 필요성 – 카자흐스탄
한국학
네트워크의 구축 현황을 중심으로 .......................................................................... 162
КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЕ КАЗАХСТАНА выпуск 2(2014) ii
ИСТОРИЯ, СОЦИОЛОГИЯ, КУЛЬТУРА
семиотические системы ............................................................................................ 175
государства Древний Чосон ..................................................................................... 193
общегосударственного экзамена в Республике Корея ........................................... 229
социализма в СССР (1937-1991 гг.)......................................................................... 237
обрядовой культуры ................................................................................................. 288
1930): к истории вопроса .......................................................................................... 293
современном мире .................................................................................................... 307
движение .................................................................................................................... 316
аспекта понятия мунъин в культуре Кореи позднего средневековья .................... 340
and
ОСПАНОВ Н.М. Сотрудничество Казахстана и Южной Кореи в ООН по устранению атомной радиации в Чернобыле и Семипалатинске ......................... 356
<참고> 장호종. 중앙아시아 인명 지명의 한글 표기 .............................................. 372
Сведения об авторах ................................................................................................. 393 집필진 ........................................................................................................................ 398
목차 ............................................................................................................................ 402
1 HANGUL AND THE KOREAN MANUAL ALPHABET
Simon Barnes-Sadler SOAS, University of London, London, UK
제목
한글과
한국
수화
필자
사이먼
반즈
새들러
영국
런던대
개요
본
연구의
목적은
한국
지문자와
한글의
관계를
살펴보는
것이다
. 첫번째로
, 한국
지문자
한국
지화와
한국
수화가
어떻게
다른지
설명한
다 . 두번째로
서양과
한국의
수화
언어에
관한
연구를
짧게
요약해서
적 절한 한국
지문자의
분석하는
방법을
찾을
수
있다
한국
지문자를
분석 하기 위하여
수형소
, 수동소와
수향소라는
수화
음운론의
개념을
소개한
다 . 한국
지문자의
수화
음운소와
한글
문자의
특성을
비교하기를
통하여
한글의
영향
때문에
한국
지문자의
구조가
유일하다고
주장한다
. 본
연구의
결과의
요약이
다음과
같다
한글
자음
중에는
평음
문자와
격음
문자의
변별적
특징이
, 즉획
수형을
통해서
반영한다
. 그렇지만
문 자의 특징을
조직적으로
반영하지
않는다
. 반면에
, 평음
문자와
격음
문 자의
변별적 특징이
조직적으로
수동을
통해서
반영한다
. 한글의
모음의
특징은
수형과
수향을
통해서
조직적으로
반영한다
. 주제어
: 지화
지문자
수화
한글
1.1 Structure This paper examines the relationship between the Korean indigenous writing system, Hangul, and the system used to represent it in the visual-gestural modality, the Korean Manual Alphabet (KMA). We discuss the analysis of signs in section 2, before going on in section 3 to describe the KMA in detail. We then briefly describe Hangul as a featural writing system and examine the regularity with which the graphical features of Hangul are reflected in the KMA. The remainder of this introduction is given to the definition of terms. Transliterations shall be given using the Yale Romanisation and italicised, except in the cases of conventional spellings or personal names, the transliterations of which shall use the preferred transliteration of the person. Where the graphemes of Hangul are
КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЕ КАЗАХСТАНА выпуск 2(2014) 2 referred to, no transliteration shall be provided and we follow Coulmas [1] in marking both the graphemes themselves and any individual graphical features with angled brackets, like so <ㅏ>.
1.2 Korean Sign Language and the Korean Manual Alphabet Despite the traditional presentation of the Korean Peninsula as linguistically homogeneous, the reality of the situation is that a diverse range of languages are used in Korea daily, including Korean Sign Language (KSL). The Deaf population is disputed, but likely lies between the government’s official estimate of 180,000 people and the Korean Association of the Deaf’s unofficial estimate of 300,000 people [2]. Furthermore, what proportion of this community use KSL regularly is unknown. This language is thought to be a member of the Japanese Sign Language family, and consequently to be related to Japanese and Taiwanese Sign Languages, as a result of its promulgation during the Japanese occupation of Korea. Its study and spread has been somewhat controversial over the latter half of the twentieth century [3], however it has received an increasing amount of attention in recent years. In many Deaf communities bilingualism with a local Language of Wider Communication (LWC) is common. This is also the case in Korea. Since those members of Deaf communities who use regional LWCs most often deal with them in their written rather than spoken modality, systems of signs representing written forms of LWCs, known colloquially as either fingerspelling or manual alphabets, are also common. In contemporary KSL, any Korean words for which there are no corresponding signs and which a user may want to incorporate into their utterances, for example personal names, are signed using the Korean Manual Alphabet. The contemporary KMA is very closely based on a system developed in 1947 by a teacher working at the Seoul School for the Deaf, Yun Baek Won [3].
1.3 Manual Alphabets and Fingerspelling Manual alphabets may be characterised as adjuncts to particular sign languages, rather than fully incorporated parts of them, as manual alphabets represent the written form of spoken languages in a signed modality. This attitude is exemplified by Choi Sang Bae’s choice to exclude the KMA from his analysis of KSL handshapes on the grounds of these signs not being lexemes in their own right [4]. However, it is not uncommon for fingerspellings to become independent words. In addition to the process whereby fingerspellings of words originally Simon Barnes-Sadler, Hangul and the Korean Manual … 3 borrowed from spoken languages may become lexicalised or nativised [5], in many sign languages fingerspelled words may be used in place of a lexeme for which a sign already exists for pragmatic reasons and thus become independent, lexical signs [6]. Manual alphabets may be classified primarily as one-handed or two-handed manual alphabets, according to the number of hands used in the production of their signs, and secondarily according to the method by which the hands are used to encode the graphemes of a given writing system. Manual alphabets may be further divided into arthrological and dactylogical systems. For arthrological manual alphabets, specific areas or features on the hand are assigned the values of graphemes, whereas dactylogical systems encode graphemes in the shape, position and movement of the hands [7]. Thus, the KMA may be described as a one-handed, dactylogical manual alphabet. Although fingerspelling and manual alphabets are often conflated, here we make a distinction. We characterise manual alphabets as collections of static signs corresponding to the graphemes of a given writing system and fingerspelling as the production of signed strings representing a signed form of a written form of a spoken form. In other words, fingerspelling may be considered the usage of manual alphabets. In the process of fingerspelling, manual alphabets do not appear as a series of static handshapes, rather as a smooth flow between handshapes representing one continuous signal. The transition between handshapes influences their formation and analogies have been drawn between fingerspelling and the production of spoken language [8]. This distinction is made here as the subsequent analysis of the KMA compares the features of each individual grapheme of Hangul with the features of the iconic form of the corresponding handshape, rather than any of the variants which arise from the production of one of the signs in a particular phonological environment. To summarise, then, the KMA is a dactylogical manual alphabet, that is to say a system for encoding the graphemes of Hangul in the visual-gestural modality. It is used as an adjunct to KSL, usually in the form of fingerspelling; in other words, combinations of KMA signs are used as a representation of a string of Hangul characters which represent a phrase of spoken Korean for which there is no sign in KSL or which the signer makes the pragmatic choice to represent not in KSL. The focus of this paper is the signs which comprise the KMA rather than the phenomena which accompany their use in fingerspelling. We now go on to provide a brief overview of the description of signed
КОРЕЕВЕДЕНИЕ КАЗАХСТАНА выпуск 2(2014) 4 language followed by a more detailed examination of the signs of the KMA. Signs were not considered analysable units until the latter part of the twentieth century [9]. The model which first recognised that signs were meaningful units composed of meaningless units proposed by Stokoe, holds that signs are analysable as simultaneously segmentable units. That is, they may be described as feature complexes, similar to phonemes – cheremes in Stokoe’s terminology. The key features of signs used under this model to distinguish minimal pairs were handshape, location and movement, designated dez, tab and sig, respectively. Subsequently, other models describing sign language phonology, suggest that signs mayalso be understood as sequentially segmentable, like spoken words [10]. Korean scholarship on the analysis of KSL began a little later than similar scholarship in the west, starting with Kim Sung Kwuk’s 1982 thesis “A Psycholinguistic Study of Korean Sign Language” [11]. This study introduced the concepts of sign language phonology as they apply to KSL, identifying 29 handshapes, 23 location features, 36 movement features, 20 orientation features and 20 non-manual features which could be considered distinctive in KSL [12]. Although these numbers are the subject of much debate (Choi Sang Bae’s 2012 analysis of KSL handshapes identifies 69 that may be considered distinctive, for example [4]) KSL is still analysed in terms of the five sorts of features which he identified. It has also been observed that Kim Sung Kwuk’s paper drew analogies between writing systems and signed language, using terminology derived from the description of Chinese characters ( 六書 - yukse) in order to create a taxonomy of signs [11]. In both scholarly traditions, the notation of signs has proven problematic. For purposes of general readability, we follow the example of pedagogic works on KSL here, where description of signs has traditionally been much more impressionistic, relying on text description rather than phonological notation. One specific piece of notation we shall make use of here, though, is the assignment of numbers to the fingers, running from one at the thumb to five at the little finger of each hand [13]. We use these terms to avoid the confusion that may arise from the differing finger names found in national varieties of English. Furthermore, in the following descriptions
Simon Barnes-Sadler, Hangul and the Korean Manual … 5 of signs we shall refer to the joint between the finger and the hand “the first knuckle” and the next joint along as “the second knuckle”. As discussed in section 1.2, while manual alphabets are used alongside sign languages, they are distinct systems. For this reason, we must ask what approach should be taken to the signs of a manual alphabet rather than a sign language. It is not necessary to describe all of the features used to distinguish between the signs of KSL when describing the KMA. For example, while location is a feature which may be used to distinguish meaning in KSL this is not the case for the KMA, which tends to be signed in a signing space just in front of the speaker’s torso by convention. In addition to this, the presentation of the hands in isolation from the rest of the signer in pedagogic materials [13] bears this out and also demonstrates that non-manual signals, such as facial expression, are not distinctive with regard to the KMA. We now go on to analyse the signs of the KMA in terms of the three remaining features, handshape, orientation and movement, all of which may be considered distinctive between the signs of the KMA. We shall pay particular attention to the sub-features which make up each handshape, for example digit extension, in order to demonstrate that the KMA generally reflects Hangul’s featural principles of design by systematically encoding the graphical elements which encode the distinctive features of spoken Korean. This is in stark contrast to other manual alphabets, which generally enjoy an entirely arbitrary relationship with the forms of the graphemes of the writing systems which they represent.
жүктеу/скачать 3,47 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|