Комментарии
«
Было очень важно видеть реакцию людей: то,
что не получается, не воспринимается «трагеди-
ей», поскольку
является результатом совместного
планирования»
37
Таб
лиц
а 1.
Схе
ма планиров
ания, наб
людения и об
су
ждения у
рок
а
Пре
дмет Приоритет об
учения
Учитель/наб
лю
да
тель
Цель об
учения данног
о по
дх
ода
Lesson
Study
(она мо
жет быть со
ст
авной частью бо
лее про
до
лжительног
о перио
да об
учения) Р
аз
ра
бо
тк
а
ка
ко
й
мет
одики об
учения яв
ляет
ся целью данног
о
Lesson
Study
?
Совершенств
ов
ание…
Тек
ущие до
стиж
ения и
критерии успе
ха.
Опишите в рамк
ах к
онкретных
аспек
тов ре
зу
ль
та
ты ,
ожидаемые Вами о
т ученик
ов
по ок
ончании
урок
а?
Иссле
ду
емый ученик
А
.................................................
Критерии у
спе
ха для данной
фок
усной гр
уппы
Иссле
ду
емый ученик
В
..................................................
Критерии у
спе
ха для данной
фок
усной гр
уппы
Иссле
ду
емый ученик
С
.................................................
Критерии у
спе
ха для данной
фок
усной гр
уппы
Эт
ап с
ерии урок
ов
Каким Вы
ожидаете о
тв
ет
ученик
а (ов) А
Как он
(она, они)
отве
чае
т в
ре
зу
ль
т
ате
наб
люд
ений
Каким Вы
ожидаете о
тв
ет
ученик
а (ов) В
Как он
(она, они)
отве
чае
т в
ре
зу
ль
т
ате
наб
люд
ений
Каким Вы
ожидаете о
тв
ет
ученик
а (ов) С
Как он
(она, они)
отве
чае
т в
ре
зу
ль
т
ате
наб
люд
ений
Примеры
/ в
опро
сы
Э
тап
...
(примерно
е время
)
Э
тап
...
(примерно
е время
)
Заклю
чительный эт
ап
...
(примерно
е время
)
Чт
о учащие
ся смог
ли
сд
ел
ат
ь?
(к
ак
ог
о прогре
сс
а
они до
стиг
ли, и к
ак
овы т
ому
по
дтв
ерждения?)
Пре
дв
арительные идеи
38
6. Опрос «исследуемых» учащихся после урока
Рекомендуемые действия
В Великобритании группы, реализующие подход
Lesson Study, на завершающем этапе нередко опрашивают
«исследуемых» учащихся с целью определения их мнения
по вопросам:
что было для них полезно;
что, по их мнению, они узнали нового;
как, на их взгляд, можно было бы изменить урок,
сделать его еще более эффективнее при условии, если бы
он повторно проводился в другом классе.
Опрос должен быть кратким (не более 5-ти минут) и
проведен со всеми исследуемыми учащимися одновременно
или с каждым из них по отдельности.
Желательно проводить опрос учащихся при первой
появившейся возможности, хотя, в идеале – по окончании
урока.
Избранные ответы необходимо дословно записывать в
своих заметках.
В отдельных случаях, по окончании урока проводят
опрос учащихся из групп, в которых обучаются исследуемые
учащиеся, что помогает анализировать ответы с разных
точек зрения, хотя, это может усложнить сбор данных.
Комментарии
Таблица 2.
Примеры вопросов для «исследуемых» учащихся
Предлагаемый перечень вопросов для проведения
опроса «исследуемых» учащихся после урока
Что тебе больше всего понравилось на уроке?
Чему ты научился? Что ты сейчас можешь делать
из того, что не мог делать прежде? Что ты можешь
сделать лучше? Насколько лучше? И т. д.
Какой этап обучения был для тебя наиболее
эффективным?
Если этот же урок будет проводиться в другой
группе, что бы ты в нем изменил и почему?
«... Они [ученики] берут в свои руки весь процесс
обучения, несут за него ответственность, и им в
этом оказывают помощь. Это - удивительно, по-
тому что… они работают в контакте с нами,
помогая
нам оказывать им помощь в обучении.
Действительно - поразительное явление!»
39
7. Обсуждение по завершении Lesson study
Рекомендуемые действия
Группе Lesson Study необходимо встретиться по-
возможности сразу после урока (разумеется, не позднее,
чем через 24 часа после урока). Вы, возможно, пожелаете
ознакомиться со следующими критериями успешного
обсуждения после Урок-study:
(а) Открытость критическим суждениям и предложениям.
(б) Приверженность объективным результатам наблю-
дений и отсутствие оправданий неудачам.
(в) Принятие совместных обсуждений после урока, как
способ совместного обучения.
(г) Постановка четких цели и вопросов в плане/карте
наблюдения.
(д) Выбор кандидатуры «модератора» обсуждения
(председателя, который может координировать обсуждение,
обеспечивая позитивное к нему отношение), выполняющего
функции, совмещенные с функцией
(е) «Советника» (заключительного комментатора), роль
которого заключается в установлении обучающего эффекта
по итогам обсуждения в качестве основы для практических
действий группы или отдельных лиц, не входящих в состав
группы Lesson Study. Данная кандидатура может быть избрана
не из числа работников школы (Такахаши, 2005).
Самое важное, что следует запомнить: анализ результатов
наблюдений за обучением «исследуемых» (и других)
учащихся предваряет анализ преподавания (см. Рис. 3, ниже).
Данная последовательность позволяет сконцентрироваться
на обучении учащихся и на его основе – на преподавании
учителей, ограждает от тенденции к проведению обсуждения
в форме отзывов о преподавании, которые могут показаться
учителям субъективными по характеру и не способствующими
их профессиональному развитию (см. Рис. 3, ниже).
Поставьте подпись и дату записи.
Храните комментарии в журнале профессионального обучения в
учительской.
Комментарии
«…Удивительно, как много Вы узнаете, поясняя
свои идеи. Поэтому, ставя перед собой задачу, Вам
необходимо обосновывать: почему я думаю, что
ее необходимо решать именно таким образом. В
результате, это действительно укрепляет Ваши
собственные знания и помогает Вам понять то, что
Вы не могли бы понять самостоятельно»
40
Рис. 3. Схема обсуждения по завершении Lesson Study
Предлагаемый ниже образец может быть использован для записи обсуждения
по итогам урока
Таблица 3.
Рекомендуемый перечень вопросов для обсуждения урока
Запись обсуждения по итогам урока
Исследуемый
ученик А
Исследуемый
ученик B
Исследуемый
ученик C
Какого прогресса достиг
каждый из учащихся? Был
ли он оптимальным? Какие
результаты демонстрируют
учащиеся групп, в которых
обучаются «исследуемые»
учащиеся?
В какой степени помогал
или мешал внедряемый
подход (возможно, то и
другое)?
Наблюдались ли
непредвиденные
обстоятельства?
Какой аспект(-ы) подхода
в обучении нуждается
в последующем
корректировании для
повышения результатов
каждого из учащихся.
•
•
К чему мы должны
стремиться в будущем
на последующих этапах
работы.
•
•
Ф.И.О.……………………………….. Дата…………………………………….
41
8. Демонстрация результатов коллегам
Рекомендуемые действия
До начала Lesson Study обеспечьте группе возможность
презентации коллегам того, что они проделали, узнали и
доработали, особенно в отношении основ внедряемого
ими подхода в обучении. Если учителя заранее знают
о предстоящем обсуждении собственных выводов с
коллегами, они будут помнить об этом в ходе реализации
подхода. Это помогает группе Lesson Study четко
формулировать свои мысли и выводы для дальнейшего их
использования и воспроизведения коллегами.
Краткие видеоролики Lesson Study и цифровые фото,
вставленные в презентации PowerPoint – популярный способ
обобщения практики и процессов проведения уроков (Вам
следует убедиться в действии в Вашей школе политики по
использованию видео и фотоматериалов).
Обеспечьте возможностями для работы членов группы
Lesson Study с другими учителями с целью оказания им
помощи (в форме проведения коучинга) в постижении
педагогической методики, которую группа Lesson Study
выработала, адаптировала или усовершенствовала.
Помните о том, что четкое формулирование, разъяснение
и демонстрация практики помогает в:
(а) усовершенствовании своей практики тем, кто учится
на опыте коллег;
(б)повышении эффективности работы специалиста,
осуществляющего разъяснение или коучинг.
Причина в том, что подобный прием наглядно
демонстрирует то, что зачастую является скрытым
(подразумеваемым) знанием практики, которое учителя
используют, но никогда не выражают непосредственно.
Разъяснение помогает им больше узнать о своих знаниях и,
следовательно, предоставляет больше возможностей для их
дальнейшего совершенствования.
Отметьте и оцените то, что Вы узнали.
Организуйте «стену обучения» в общем кабинете
для персонала, на которой группа Lesson study может
презентовать свою работу (фотографии, заметки,
наблюдения, результаты дискуссий, опросы учащихся,
предварительные выводы). Это способствует активности
и разнообразию обсуждений в учительском кабинете
в течение длительного времени после формального
представления.
Комментарии
«По причине своей чрезвычайной занятости
учителя, как правило, желают видеть лично
для себя результативность того, что они
внедряют, в связи с чем, краткая текстовая
информация и видеоматериалы оказывают в
этом действенную помощь».
42
9. Планирование времени для реализации подхода Lesson Study и
включение его в школьные образовательные программы
Рекомендуемые действия
Lesson study – это разумное соотношение «цены и
качества», если Вы действительно создаете возможность для
внедрения результатов этого подхода в практику как учителей,
занимающихся исследованием, так и других коллег в школе.
Некоторые директора школ отвели специальное время для
профессионального обучения, при котором группы Lesson Study
планируют и анализируют свои уроки за счет времени, которое
обычно отводится на профессиональное развитие и управление.
Разумное использование времени PPA на обучение
специалистов, разработка различных графиков и прочих
средств, позволяющих учителям свободно общаться, может
обеспечить возможности для планирования или обсуждения по
итогам урока, для которых не всегда требуются материальные
средства.
Руководители различных уровней в сфере образования
могут включить Lesson Study в систему преподавания и
учения своей школы в качестве политики профессионального
обучения сотрудников. Это предоставляет учителям и
другим специалистам право на профессиональное обучение
и возможности непрерывного профессионального развития,
предполагающие модели, признанные в настоящее время и
имеющие наибольшее влияние на учебную практику (см. стр. 1).
Один из примеров - установление продуктивной связи
Lesson Study и управление его эффективностью, благодаря чему
участие в Lesson Study и презентация его результатов коллегам,
рассматривалась как компонент управления эффективностью.
Вовлеченные сотрудники подтверждали, что участие в Lesson
Study способствовало их совершенствованию в вопросах, в
решении которых они чувствовали себя менее уверенно, в отличие
от работы без риска в области, недостаточно эффективной с
точки зрения преподавания.
Важно, чтобы подход Lesson Study осуществлялся независимо
от проведения мониторинга эффективности.
Некоторые
группы
Lesson
Study
демонстрируют
разрабатываемые ими методики другим учителям на открытых
Lesson Study, в процессе которых учащиеся остаются после
занятий, и уроки проводятся в зале для приглашенной аудитории
из близлежащих университетов с последующим живым
обсуждением. Такая форма популярна в Японии.
Комментарии
«…Меня удивило и искренне обрадовало то, что люди,
которые, зачастую, закрывали дверь класса и вели
уроки, вдруг осознали: «Это - действительно полезно и
целесообразно для меня и для детей на уроках. То, что
я делаю, демонстрирует результат не только в моем
классе, но в школе в целом».
43
10. Вовлечение тренеров по Lesson Study в целях содействия
профессиональному обучению на основе подхода Lesson
Study и использования его модели в качестве платформы для
межведомственного или межшкольного коучинга
Рекомендуемые действия
Ведущие учителя и консультанты могут оказывать
содействие процессу группы Lesson Study посредством:
•
Демонстрации подхода в школе для других
учителей перед началом Lesson Study.
•
Присоединения к группе Lesson Study в ходе
планирования и внесения в процесс Lesson
Study своих идей и предложений.
•
Совместного с группой Lesson Study
обсуждения подготовленного ими Lesson
Study и внесения предложений о способах
разработки педагогической стратегии.
•
Присутствия на Lesson Study в качестве
наблюдателей (с соответствующим статусом)
и участия в опросе учащихся и обсуждении
итогов урока.
Ведущие учителя-предметники могут играть
аналогичную роль, в особенности, если они сами
участвуют в цикле Lesson Study и становятся лидерами
в школе.
Дополнительный интерес к подходу Lesson Study и
признание его значимости могут быть обеспечены при
условии использования данной методики учителями
с целью создания портфолио, подтверждений
конкретных приемов преподавания или получения
профессиональной/научной
квалификации
и
признания.
Когда учителями будет разработана практика,
оказывающая явное влияние на обучение и
совершенствование учащихся, и которая, по Вашему
мнению, будет интересна другим, зарегистрируйте ее
как практическое исследование на сайте
www. lessonstudy. co. uk
Данный вебсайт разработан для оказания помощи
практикующим специалистам в выборе и дальнейшем
использовании практики совершенствования в классах
и школах, которая доказала свою эффективность в
одном месте и может работать в других.
Комментарии
44
Использованная литература
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). Improving practice and progression
through lesson study: a handbook for head teachers, leading teachers and subject
leaders [Усовершенствование практики и достижение прогресса посредством
Lesson Study: руководство для старших преподавателей, учителей-лидеров и
учителей-предметников]. London: DCSF.
Dudley, P. (2008). Lesson study in England: from school networks to national policy [Lesson
study в Англии: от школьных сетевых сообществ до государственной политики].
Presented at the World Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Hong
Kong Institute of Education.
Dudley, P. (2011). How Lesson Study orchestrates key features of teacher knowledge and
teacher learning to create profound changes in professional practice [Каким образом
Lesson Study определяет основное содержание знаний и обучения учителя для
создания значительных перемен в профессиональной практике]. Presented at the
World Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Tokyo.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (1999). TIMSS 1999 assessment
results [Результаты по итогам оценивания международного исследования по
оценке качества математического и естественнонаучного образования 1999
года]. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/
Takahashi, A. (2005). An essential component of lesson study: post-lesson discussion
[Основной компонент Lesson study: обсуждение урока после его проведения].
Presented at the The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory›s Lesson Study
Symposium, Olympia, Washington: DePaul University, Chicago.
Wragg, E.C., Wikely, F., Wragg, E., & Haynes, G. (1996). Teacher appraisal observed
[Наблюдение и анализ учителя]. London: Routledge.c
Lesson Study:
A Handbook
Pete Dudley
Lesson Study UK
www.lessonstudy.uk
Astana, 2013
46
CONTENTS
Lesson Study: a handbook…………………...………………………………………..……48
Why conduct a Lesson Study? ...........................................................................................50
Getting Lesson Study going ……………………………………………..............……….52
Planning the first Research lesson and identifying the ’case pupils’…………….............54
Teaching the first research lesson……………………………………......………………..56
Interviewing case pupils after the lesson………………………………….......…………..58
The post research lesson discussion ……………………………………………......…….59
Formally sharing the outcomes with other professionals ………………………….......…61
Creating time for lesson study and building it into school systems ……………......……62
Using LS coaches to support and develop the professional learning from Lesson Study and
using the lesson study model as a platform for cross departmental or school
to school coaching…………….......................................................………………………63
References…………………..……………………………………………………….…….64
47
Emeritus Professor, University of Leicester, Secretary of the
International Association of Lesson Study, PhD (United Kingdom).
Peter Dudley taught for many years in Primary and Secondary
schools in East London and abroad. He has held leadership roles
in a number of school districts in England and for 5 years was
Director of the UK Governments Primary National Strategy. An
education writer and researcher, Peter introduced Lesson Study into
the UK in 2001 leading and advising a large number of national
development and research LS programs in the past 12 years and
government policy. Peter is Honorary General Secretary of the
World Association of Lesson Studies. His recent research ‘How Teachers Learn in contexts
of Lesson Study’ was a runner up in the British Educational Research Association doctoral
awards 2012.
48
Lesson Study: a handbook
This booklet is a guide on how to use Lesson Study to develop and refine teaching,
learning and teacher practice knowledge.
The booklet will help you in:
• getting lesson study going in school,
• planning, teaching and analysing the research lesson
• involving pupils in the process
• passing on to others the new practice knowledge you have gained in your lesson study.
Lesson Study (LS) is a highly specified form of classroom action research focusing on
the development of teacher practice knowledge. It has been in use in Japan since the 1870s.
LS therefore pre-dates action research as we know it in the West, by some 70 years.
LS involves groups of teachers collaboratively planning, teaching, observing and
analysing learning and teaching in ‘research lessons’. They record their findings. Over a
cycle of research lessons they may innovate or refine a pedagogical approach which will
be shared with others both through public research lessons, and through the publication of
a paper outlining their work.
LS only started to become popular in the west this century, following the success
attributed to it by US researchers in developing deep teacher knowledge of both pedagogy
and of subject amongst Japanese teachers which leads to high standards of educational
attainment by Japanese pupils when compared with those of comparable groups of pupils
in the US (Stigler and Hiebert, 1999; TIMSS., 1999).
In East Asia LS is now in use beyond Japan in countries such as Singapore, Hong Kong,
and China. In the West it is in use in countries including the US, the UK, Sweden and
Canada.
Lesson Study has been used successfully in this country to improve teaching techniques
and pupil progress in core subjects in primary and secondary universities and to develop
broader pedagogic approaches such as assessment for learning (AfL). During a Lesson
Study cycle a small group of teachers (or even a pair) will:
• Use the data they have gathered from day to day and periodic assessment to agree a
focus for the pupil learning and progress.
• Jointly identify a teaching technique to develop or improve which addresses that need
(See Fig. 1 Page 4)
• Identify around three ‘case pupils’. Each should typify a group of learners in the class
– for example high, middle or lower attaining in the strand being taught and developed.
• Jointly plan a ‘research lesson’ which both uses develops and closely studies theeffects
of this new approach –.and keeps in mind the three case pupils..
• Teach and jointly observe the research lesson focusing on the case pupils’ learning
and progress. They may repeat and refine this over several lessons. Not all these need to be
observed research lessons.
• Interview the case pupils to gain their insights into the research lesson.
• Hold a post research lesson discussion analysing how the case pupils responded to
the technique, what progress they made, what evidence of learning or of difficulties with
learning they displayed and what can be learned about the way the teaching or learning
approach is further developed – next time.
• Formally share the outcomes with a wider audience of other teachers – in a presentation,
49
by demonstration or by coaching.
Guidance for each of these stages is unpacked in the sections of this booklet. This draws
on what we know about how lesson study has worked in schools and colleges in England
and overseas.
The final two sections provide ideas on how school leaders can
a. Create time for lesson study and building it into school systems
b. Use leading teachers to support and develop the professional learning from Lesson
Study and using the lesson study model as a platform for in-school coaching
Acknowledgements
This booklet draws upon Crown Copyright material written by the author for the National
Strategies (2008), the National College for School Leadership (2003, 2005), the Teaching
and Learning Research Programme (TLRP) and CfBT.
The research drawn upon in this publication and in those listed above was carried out by
the author between 2003 and 2011 at the University of Cambridge with the assistance of
a fellowship awarded by the Economic and Social Research Council’s Teaching and
Learning research programme.
I would like to thank the very many teachers, head teachers, local authority staff,
academics, policy makers and international colleagues who have all enabled and contributed
to my knowledge and understanding of Lesson Study and thus to this book.
Pete Dudley
Cambridge, 2011
50
1. Why conduct a Lesson Study?
Panel 1.
Lesson Study works .. because it helps teachers to:
• see pupil learning occurring in much sharper detail than is usually possible
• see the gaps between what they had assumed was happening when pupils learned
and what it actually happening
• find out how to plan learning which is better matched to the pupils’ needs as a
result
• do all this in the context of a supportive teaching and learning community which
is strongly committed to helping pupils to learn and to the professional learning
of the members of the group. (Dudley, P. 2011a)
• Take these abilities into their teaching
Dudley, P (2011) Lesson Study: what it is, how and why it works and who isc using it,
www.teachingexpertise.com
The simple fact is that successful teachers are largely blind to much – perhaps even to
most - of what of what is happening in their classrooms. This is not a failing! It is the
result of processes that have enabled them to become successful teachers.
I will explain what I mean. Classrooms are amongst the most complex working
environments in which any professionals have to operate. The amount of information
that is generated by 30 or more learners engaged in lesson activities over the course of
an hour or so is vast. So is the speed at which the information comes at a teacher; in
fact the Japanese say that ‘a lesson is like a swiftly flowing river’ (Lewis 1999).
Researchers have studied how teachers cope with this complexity and speed. Wragg et
al., (1996) found that teachers who survive their first three years and become good
teachers do so because every time they discover a new way of managing a teaching
situation that has presented a challenge to them, they rapidly internalise the practice
knowledge they gain in a form that can be drawn upon unconsciously when it is next
needed in the classroom. Practice knowledge in this form is not something a teacher is
often conscious of knowing. It is tacit. Like our knowledge of how to ride a bicycle, it only
manifests itself when it is needed and it is very difficult to put into words.
Unlike surgeons for example whose practice knowledge is recorded in great detail and
made accessible to others and replicable, teacher practice knowledge tends to stay with
the teacher who discovered it and who is usually unconscious of its existence. Because
teachers tend to practice in isolation as lone professionals with their classes, other
teachers seldom get an opportunity to see others’ tacit knowledge manifested in action.
When a teacher’s practice is observed by another professional it is more likely to be in
the context of some form of appraisal or judgement of performance than in a context of
professional learning and in such contexts teachers tend to play safe with the practices
51
they put on view.
Unlike most animals, human beings have learned to deal with high volumes of
information by filtering. For example, we actively pay attention to a tiny proportion of the
sounds that we technically ‘hear’. We have evolved methods of filtering out extraneous
information and paying attention only to what is important or very unexpected. These
filtering mechanisms have enabled us to focus on and process what we have identified
as important in achieving our goal. In the classroom, we do the same. We focus on the
most critically important aspects of what is happening at any one time filtering out a lot of
extraneous events and information. We deal swiftly with new knowledge gained that we
have deemed important by storing it immediately in tacit form. All this leaves our
conscious working memory freer to deal with the next important things we have
prioritised in the complex and swift environment of the lesson.
Lesson Study helps experienced as well as inexperienced teachers to learn. Because,
through the processes of joint planning, joint observation, joint analysis we have to
imagine learning together, we get to see aspects of pupil learning through the eyes of
others as well as our own and we compare actual learning observed in the research
lesson with the learning we imagined when we planned it. This forces us to become
conscious of things we would normally not be conscious of either because we would
filter it out or because it would be dealt with through our tacit knowledge system.
Many people who have used Lesson Study have said that focusing on and thus
becoming more aware of the learning needs and behaviours of individual case pupils
somehow makes them more aware of the individuality of all their pupils. So instead of
teaching to a ‘middle’ with groups of high and lower achieving pupils on either side,
Lesson Study helps teachers to be more aware of the needs of individuals in their
subsequent teaching but seemingly without being overwhelmed by the experience.
My research (Dudley, 2011b) indicates that this may be as a result of the fact that the
reflexive, recursive and collaborative experience of Lesson Study helps the experienced
teacher, a teacher who successfully utilises her ability to filter complex classroom
information, to select some of these filters and to switch them off. This allows, in a
controlled way, aspects of classroom information that relate to the pupil learning in
focus, to become visible that would otherwise have been filtered out. Lesson Study
seems to help teachers to learn how to switch these filters off when all their prior
experience has taught them that success lies in switching them on.
52
2. Getting Lesson Study going
A Lesson Study consists of a cycle of at least three ‘research lessons’ that are jointly
planned, taught/observed and analysed by a Lesson Study group. (See Fig. 1 below).
Figure 1: The Lesson Study process
Bethlehem University ‘Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning’ Learning Toolkit: Lesson Study,
Dudley, P., (2011)
‘It enabled me to
see things in my
classroom differently’
53
What has worked well
Choose a group of teachers – three works well –
who are likely to enjoy the challenge of starting up a
new professional learning approach in the department.
Lesson Study works well when there is at least one
member of the senior team involved and the teachers
have a mix of teaching experience.
Hold a meeting with them to set out expectations
and ground rules which enable people to feel free to
take risks and not feel they are under scrutiny. In a
lesson study all members of group are of equal
status – as professional learners.
Develop some parameters which are based on
identified school or class / year group needs. (For
example to develop the use of discussion for learning
in group work sessions). Use common LS formats for
lesson planning, observation or analysis. (Examples
you can use are in this booklet)
Give teachers dedicated time (an hour at least) to
plan the first research lesson. Protect their time on
the day of the research lesson and make sure they can
have a post lesson discussion immediately or soon
after carrying out the research lesson. Take an active
interest in how the process is going. Make sure the
LS group has dedicated opportunities to share what
they have developed with other colleagues – a staff
meeting, a coaching opportunity.
Use these members of the group as lesson study
champions in the faculty to convene and develop the
next Lesson Study groups.
Notes
54
3, 4. Planning the first Research lesson and
identifying the ‘case pupils’
What has worked
Agree which class you will conduct the first
research lesson in and then identify three pupils who
reflect different groups of learner in the class – pupils
who aremaking good, average or below average
progress either in a cross curricular skill such as
academic writing, or in a subject specific aspect of
learning.
Agree the level each pupil is working at in the focus
area of this session.Write out in full exactly what you
want each pupil to be able to do by the end of the
research lesson. (You can use the planner on page 6).
Plan each stage of the lesson with particular
attention to the sequence where you use the teaching
technique you are refining or planning. Note down
what you hopethe response of each case pupil will be.
What will each pupil will do at this point to evidence
their progress?
Identify as carefully as you can: what resources will
be used and how, what you will write on the board and
indicate timings for the lesson stages.
Agree who will focus their observations on which
case pupil(s). It helps to have some rules to ensure you
don’t all gather data about two pupils and miss the
third.
A lesson study planner is provided on page 52. It
should be enlarged to A3 for use.Each lesson study
group member should have a copy at the start of
the lesson because it also serves as an observation
annotation sheet and the basis for the post lesson
discussion.
Notes
‘Focusing down on the case pupils has
enabled a number of really important
things to be revealed’
Case pupil A Name …………..
Success criterion for this focus
By the end of the sequence Pupil
A will (describe what they will do
todemonstrate progress in the
identified learning goal in the
lesson)
Additional notes
55
Figure 2: Princeples of Lesson Study
56
5. Teaching the first research lesson
What works
Use the research lesson planner on the following page to
plan the research lesson. It works best blown up to A3. It also
acts as the observation sheet (if photocopied and provided to
the observers in the research lesson) and is the key point of
reference for the post lesson discussion.
Take real care over the joint assessment of the stages which
the three case pupils are working at. You can make reference
to the Assessing Pupil Progress materials. It is really important
that the group clearly writes what they want each pupil to be
able to do in the focus strand by the end of the lesson and what
they will be looking for as evidenceof this.
Because the research lesson is jointly planned, it is jointly
owned by the group. This means the focus for the observers is
less on the teacher and more on the learners – the focus pupils.
They should try to start each observation as if zoomed-in on
the focus pupil and then pan back to allow a bigger group or
the whole class to come into frame.
Observers should try to capture the focus pupils’ responses
at different points in the lesson – and how they match or differ
from what was predicted at that stage. Note also any critical
incidents. If there is a common pattern (e.g. all focus pupils
misunderstand something in the same way) note it
in the right hand column.
Note the time against each annotation if you can.
At the conclusion, look for the evidence of progress for
each pupil against what was planned and the extent they are
achieved. What are key points for the next lesson for the focus
pupils, their groups or the class? What might you want to ask
them in their post lesson interview? Jot this down in ‘initial
thoughts’ at the bottom of the page.
Notes
‘
What’s very powerful is that
people felt that because they’d
planned together, it made it okay if it
went wrong..’
57
Table 1: Resear
ch lesson planning, observation and discussion sheet
Subject
Learning Focus
T
eacher/observer
What this research lesson is aiming to teach (it may be a secti
on of a longer teaching sequence)
What teaching technique is the research lesson aiming to develop?
W
e are improving…
Current attainment and success criteria Describe what you are
looking for from them
by
end
of
lesson
in
the
identified aspect
Case pupil
A
…………………….
Success criterion for this focus
Case pupil B ……………………. Success criterion for this focus
Case pupil C ……………………. Success criterion for this focus
Stage of lesson sequence
How you hope case pupil(s)
A
will respond
How they are observed to respond
How you hope case pupil(s) B will respond
How they are observed to respond
How you hope case pupil(s) C will respond
How they are observed to respond
Patterns / issues
Stage … (approximate time)
Stage … (approximate time)
Final stage … (approximate time)
What were they able to do? (What progress have they made and how do you know?)
Initial thoughts
58
6. Interviewing case pupils after the lesson
What works
In the UK lesson study groups often interview the
focuspupils after the research lesson to gain their perspectives
on what worked for them, what they felt they learned and
how they think lesson could be changed if it were taught
again to another class in order to make it work even better.
The interview should be short (no more than 5 minutes)
and can be done with all the case pupils in a group or
individually.
Try to conduct the post lesson pupil interview at the first
opportunity – ideally at the end of the lesson.
Try to capture some of their exact words in your notes.
Some people conduct the post research lesson pupil
interview with other pupils but who are in the same three
learner groups as the case pupils. This can help triangulate
findings – but it can also complicate the data set.
Notes
Table 2: Suggested questions for a post lesson interview with the case pupils
…they [pupils] begin to take ownership of the whole learning
process, they take responsibility for it and also they’re helped. It’s
amazing because … they’re engaging with us, in helping us to
help them to learn. Incredible stuff really, incredible stuff!’
Suggested questions for a post lesson interview with the case pupils
What did you enjoy most
about that lesson?
What did you learn?
(What can you do now
that you could not do.
What can you do better?
How is it better?)
What aspect of the
teaching worked best for
you?
If the same lesson is
being taught to another
group what would you
change. Why would you
change that aspect?
59
7. The post research lesson discussion
What works
Come together as soon as you can after the Research
Lesson (and certainly not later than 24 hours afterwards).
You may wish to review the following qualities of a
successful post Research Lesson discussion.
(a) Openness to critical viewpoints and
suggestions
(b) Fidelity to observed data and no excusing
failure
(c) Viewing the post lesson discussion as a joint
learning opportunity
(d) Clear goals and questions from the
plan/observation sheet
(e) A designated ‘moderator’ for the discussion
(a chair who can lead the discussion positively,) a
role that can be combined with that of
(f) ‘Adviser,’ (final commentator) whose role it
is to capture the learning distilled from the
discussion, in order that it can be acted upon
by the group and others beyond the group. This
person may be external to the school (Takahashi,
2005).
The most important thing to remember though is that
the flow of analysis needs to start with the observations
made of the case pupils’ (and other pupils’) learning
before it addresses the teaching (See Fig 3 below). This
preserves the focus on student learning and on teacher
learning from this and reduces the tendency for lesson
observation discussions to become feedback on teaching
(which teachers can feel is judgmental in nature and not
conducive to teacher learning (See Fig 3 below).
Notes
‘….it’s amazing how much you learn by explicating
your ideas, so in challenging me, I have to justify
why I think we should do this in this particular way
and through that it really strengthens your own knowledge
and gets you to a place you could not get on your own’
60
Sign and date the record.
Keep the notes in a professional learning log in the
staffroom.
Post Lesson Discussion record
Case pupil A
Case pupil B
Case pupil C
What progress did each
pupil make? Was this
enough?
What about others in
the group of learners
they typify?
How did the technique
being developed help or
hinder? (Maybe a bit of
both)
What surprises were
there?
What aspect(s) of the
teaching technique
could be adjusted next
time to improve the
progress of each
•
•
So what should we try
next time?
•
•
Figure 3: Post Research Lesson Discussion Flow
Full name.……………………………….. Date…………………………………….
61
8. Formally sharing the outcomes with other professionals
What works
Arrange an opportunity ahead of the lesson study for the
group to share with colleagues what they have done, learned
and refined - especially in the key teaching technique being
developed. If people know in advance that they will have to
share their findings with others, then they will bear this in mind
throughout the proceedings. This helps the lesson study group
keep their thinking and their findings clear, more useable and
replicable by others.
Video snips of the research lessons and digital photos
embedded in PowerPoint presentations are a popular way of
conveying lesson practice and processes. (You will need to
ensure you have a school policy on use of video and photos in
place).
Arrange opportunities for members of the lesson study
group to work with other teachers in order to help coach the
pedagogic technique they have evolved, adapted or refined.
Remember that articulating and explaining practice and
making it visible to others
(a) helps those learning from their peers improve
their practice
(b) improves the performance of the person doing
the explaining or coaching.
This is because it makes visible what is often tacit knowledge
of practice - which teachers use but never express. Articulating
this helps them become more aware of their knowledge
themselves and therefore more able to improve it further.
Celebrate and value what has been learned and shared.
Create a ‘learning wall’ in the departmental common room
where a lesson study group can display their work – photos,
notes, observations, discussion outcomes, pupil interviews and
tentative conclusions. This creates lots of staffroom talk about
professional learning long after the formal sharing is over.
Notes
‘Because the typical sort of teacher is extremely busy,
they want to see that what you’re putting forward is going
to be of use to them and so little snippets, with a video is
really helpful for that..’
62
9. Creating time for lesson study and building
it into school systems
What works
Lesson study is very good value for money if you genuinely
create opportunities for its outcomes to feed into the practices of
those involved in the study and others in the school.
Some heads have created dedicated professional learning time
when lesson study groups plan and analyse their lessons from time
normally allocated to professional development and management.
Judicious use of PPA time, specialist teaching time, staggered
timetables or break times and any other means which allow some
teachers to be free to talk together, can create opportunities for
planning or post lesson discussion which do not always demand
supply cover.
Heads of department can build Lesson Study into their school
teaching and learning policy by creating a staff professional learning
policy. These gives teachers and others entitlement to professional
learning and CPD opportunities which include the models now
recognised as having most impact on classroom practice. (See
page 1).
One example of linking Lesson Study with performance
management productively was achieved by treating participation
in lesson study and sharing of the outcomes with colleagues - as
a component of performance management. Staff involved felt that
with lesson study they improved areas where they felt less
confident rather than playing safe in an area of relative teaching
strength.
It is important to keep lesson study separate from performance
monitoring.
Some lesson study groups demonstrate the techniques they
develop to other teachers in a public research lesson. Here pupils
stay behind after school and the lesson is taught in the hall in front
of an invited audience from neighbouring universities. A lively
discussion follows. This is popular in Japan.
Notes
‘…what I’ve been surprised and really pleased about I
think is that people who normally close the door
and get on with what they do in a lesson, have suddenly
thought ‘Oh hang on, this is good for me, within my
lesson. It’s good for the kids within my lesson, it’s
practical, I’m doing something. And they’ve really got on
board. And that’s been remarkable in our place..’
63
10. Using LS coaches to support and develop the professional learning
from Lesson Study and using the lesson study model as a platform for
cross departmental or school to school coaching
What works
Leading teachers or consultants can support the lesson
study process if they:
• Demonstrate a technique in the school immediately to
other teachers prior to alesson study cycle beginning.
• Join a lesson study group as they plan a research lesson
and contribute ideas andsuggestions.
• Sit with a lesson study group and discuss theresearch
lesson they have prepared – contributing to suggestions
about how thepedagogic technique could be developed
• Join a research lesson as an observer (with equal status)
and participate in the post lesson pupil interview and
discussion.
Subject leaders can play a similar role – especially if they
have participated in a lesson study cycle themselves and
become a champion in school.
Additional interest and value can be created around
lesson study if it is used by teachers to develop a portfolio
to evidence particular teaching standards, or to contribute
towards professional or academic qualification or recognition.
When your teachers have developed some practice which
has had a clear impact on learning and progress of pupils
and which you think others would be interested in – log the
practice as a caseled study at
www. lessonstudy. co. uk
This is a website designed to help practitioners
search for and share practice in classrooms and
school improvement which have worked in one
place and could work elsewhere.
Notes
64
References
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). Improving practice and
progression throughlesson study: a handbook for headteachers, leading teachers and
subject leaders. London: DCSF.
Dudley, P. (2008). Lesson study in England: from school networks to national policy.
Presented at theWorld Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Hong
Kong Institute of Education.
Dudley, P. (2011). How Lesson Study orchestrates key features of teacher knowledge and
teacherlearning to create profound changes in professional practice. Presented at the
World Associationof Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Tokyo.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (1999). TIMSS 1999 assessment
results. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/
Takahashi, A. (2005). An essential component of lesson study: post-lesson discussion.
Presented at the The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory’s Lesson Study
Symposium, Olympia, Washington: DePaul University, Chicago.
Wragg, E.C., Wikely, F., Wragg, E., & Haynes, G. (1996). Teacher appraisal observed.
London: Routledge.
Lesson Study: теориясы мен қолдану тәсілдері
Lesson Study: теория и практика применения
Lesson Study: a handbook
Подписано в печать 5 ноября 2013 года.
Гарнитура «Times New Roman» Усл. п.л. 4
Бумага 120 гр.
Издательско-полиграфическая фирма «Арт Print XXI»
г. Астана, ул. Кенесары, 47, ВП 10
Тел.: + 7 /7172/ 677 544
Document Outline - Пустая страница
- Пустая страница
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |