Читательская грамотность. Минск: рикз, 2020. 201 с
жүктеу/скачать 3,64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
| International Journal Topics in Cognitive Psychology
, 114 , 693-723. Santini, M. (2006), Web pages, text types, and linguistic features: Some issues. International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (CAME), 30 , 67-86. Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (2006). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers. A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2014). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and non- academic track students. Journal of Research on Reading, 00 (00), 1-18. DOI:10.1111/1467- 9817.12027. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47 , 427-463. Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 877-896. Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Trendtel, M. (2015). The school age gender gap in reading achievement: Examining the influences of item format and intrinsic reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 50 (1), 1 –14. doi: 10.1002/rrq.92 Simon, H. A. (1996). Observations on the sciences of science learning. Paper prepared for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning for the Sciences of Science Learning: An Interdisciplinary Discussion. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University. 200 Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54 , 574-591. Smith, M. C., Mikulecky, L., Kibby, M. W., Dreher, M. J., & Dole, J. A. (2000). What will be the demands of literacy in the workplace in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35 (3), 378-383. Snow and the Rand Corporation. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation Report. Solis, M., Miciak, J., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2014). Why intensive interventions matter: Longitudinal studies of adolescents with reading disabilities and poor reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly . Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0731948714528806 Spiro, J. J., Deschryver, M., Hagerman, M. S., Morsink, P., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (2015). Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices. New York: Routledge. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2013). Multiple document comprehension: An approach to public understanding of science. Cognition and Instruction, 31 , 122-129. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content –source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. жүктеу/скачать 3,64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|