138
№ 1(134)/2021
Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің ХАБАРШЫСЫ.
Педагогика. Психология. Әлеуметтану сериясы
ISSN: 2616-6895, eISSN: 2663-2497
16. Wall T. F. The transferability of higher order cognitive skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,
174, 233-238 (2015).
17. Schraw G., Crippen K. J., & Hartley K. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition
as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, 36(1-2), 111-139 (2006).
18. Young A., & Fry J. D. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal
of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8 (2), 1-10 (2008).
19. Duke N. K., Pearson P. D., Strachan S. L., & Billman A. K. Essential elements of fostering and teaching
reading comprehension. What research has to say about reading instruction, 4, 286-314 (2011).
20. Duke N. K., & Pearson P. D. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of
education, 189 (1-2), 107-122 (2009).
21. Anderson N. J. The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest
(2002).
22. Durkin D. Teaching them to read. (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon (1993).
23. Kintsch W., & van Dijk T. A. (1978). Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production.
Psychological Review, 83, 363-394.
24. Kline P., & Meyer-Brown, N. BrainWare® Safari: Cognitive Skills Development and Learning to Read.
25. Malekzadeh B., & Bayat A. The effect of mind mapping strategy on comprehending implicit information
in EFL reading texts. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(3), 81-90 (2015).
26. Khansir A. A., & Dashti J. G. The Effect of Question-Generation Strategy on Iranian EFL Learners’
Reading Comprehension Development. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 38-45 (2014).
27. Hagaman J. L., & Reid R. The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of
middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 222-234 (2008).
28. Leopold C., & Leutner D. Improving students’ science text comprehension through metacognitive self-
regulation when applying learning strategies. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 313-346 (2015).
29. National Reading Panel (US). National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: an Evidence-based
Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (2000).
30. Tavakoli H., & Koosha M. The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading
comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian University EFL students (2016).
31. Gurses M. O., & Adiguzel O. C. The Effect of Strategy Instruction Based on the Cognitive Academic
Language Learning Approach over Reading Comprehension and Strategy Use. Journal of education and
learning, 2(2), 55-68 (2013).
32. Pei L. Does metacognitive strategy instruction indeed improve Chinese EFL learners’ reading
comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness?. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5),
1147 (2014).
33. Meniado J. C. Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance
of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9 (3), 117-129 (2016).
34. Rubin J. Teaching language-learning strategies. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-5 (2013).
35. Chamot A. U. Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual review of
applied linguistics, 25, 112-130 (2005).
36. Oxford R. L. Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. Methodology in
language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 4(3), 124-132 (2002).
37. Ali A. M., & Razali, A. BA Review of Studies on Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies in
Teaching Reading Comprehension for ESL/EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94-111 (2019).
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: