МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ «МОДЕРНИЗАЦИЯ СОЗНАНИЯ:
ХАРАКТЕР ПЕРЕДАЧИ ОБРАЗА «ӘЛЕМ» В ДУХОВНОМ
НАСЛЕДИИ
131
significant differences between how instructors replied to the questionnaire and how they practice in
the classroom. These disparities were discovered by the investigator's attentive monitoring of the
courses.
When it comes to English teaching methods, the teachers have differing viewpoints. While the
majority of the instructors interviewed were positive about the communicative approach, others were
found to be more enthusiastic about it. Despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of these kind of
supporters is tiny, they believe that the approach is the sole way for teaching English and that it should
be used globally. However, the majority of instructors believe that instead of employing an uniform
teaching style, teachers should be free to choose any method for pupils that they believe is the best
appropriate approach for that specific group.
Many teachers believe that too much emphasis has been placed
on communicative language
education, and that it should only be utilized to a limited amount. They also suggested that other
established
language education approaches, like the Grammar-Translation Method (GTM), be
combined. These teachers advocate for the grammar–translation technique and embrace traditional
ideas on language teaching methods.
There are examples of instructors who do not use communicative language
instruction in their
classrooms but have a positive attitude about the technique. Teachers who teach English in the same
old conventional techniques, such as teaching structure, lexicon instruction, pattern drill, and so on, and
who have little knowledge of the communicative approach, have a favourably stated attitude toward it.
Some other teachers, who do not utilise or recognise the necessity for audiovisual aids in ESL courses,
have a positive attitude toward them.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: