Читательская грамотность. Минск: рикз, 2020. 201 с
жүктеу/скачать 3,64 Mb. Pdf көрінісі
|
1-ex pisa
| scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development. Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263 –277. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis. Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263 –277. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.051 Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443- 468. 197 OECD. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33692793 OECD. (2002). Reading for change - Performance and engagement across countries, OECD, Paris. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world, volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 assessment framework - Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009assessmentframework- keycompetenciesinreadingmathematicsandscience.htm OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn – Student engagement, strategies and practices (volume III). PISA/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd- ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2009-results-learning-to-learn_9789264083943-en OECD. (2011). PISA: Do students today read for pleasure? PISA in Focus, vol.8, p. 20. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on Line. Digital technologies and performance. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en OECD. (2012). The OECD Internet economy outlook. Retrieved from http://www.oecd- ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-internet-economy-outlook-2012_9789264086463-en OECD. (2013a). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en OECD. (2013b). PISA 2015 draft frameworks. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en OECD. (2015), Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en O'Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2013). Reading for understanding: How performance moderators and scenarios impact assessment design (ETS Research Report No. RR-13-31). Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-13-31.pdf Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 399-438. doi:10.1080/07370000701632371 Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of жүктеу/скачать 3,64 Mb. Достарыңызбен бөлісу:
|