Қазақ мемлекеттік қыздар педагогикалық университетінің Хабаршысы № 1 (77), 2019
146
2) methods of changing relationships: a demonstration of relationships, personal example,
situational, collective self-analysis;
3) methods of changing the components of the educational system: its goals and perspectives,
traditions and rituals. [4, 269-270]
In our opinion, the whole difficulty lies in the fact that the teacher prepares future teachers,
instructors, i.e. of his or her own kind.
It is not a secret for anyone that the decisive factor in building a model of a specialist should be
the result of the learning process, which is also the main indicator of the quality of education. [5.179]
All disputes, reforms, educational hypotheses pursue one goal - to substantiate and achieve a result that
corresponds to the current state of the needs of society.
For the present, the competence-based approach in education, grounded on some potential
psychological neoplasms (knowledge, ideas, action algorithms, values and relations), is relevant. It
should be remembered that the composition and nature of competences of the specialist model,
predetermines training, and is a system-forming factor for selecting the content of education. [5, p. 188]
However, the basis of all competences is scientific knowledge. To determine the competence
model of a specialist, according to S.S. Kunanbayeva the following assumptions should be based on: a)
the integrative essence of qualification; b) from current, fundamental, theoretical training; c) importance
for them of reflexive-communicative personal properties; d) from the dynamic nature of competence as
such [6; 77].
It has already been determined that the principal difference in the technology of competence-
based education is the shift of emphasis from educational activities to self-education, in changing the
role of the teacher to the role of a consultant - teacher. By the student's self-educational activity, we will
understand ―the synthesis of cognitive, practical-objective and personal experience obtained through a
sequence of situations close to reality and requiring more and more competent actions, evaluations, and
reflection of the acquired experience‖ [6; 90].
In our opinion, the component composition of competencies should include in the list of
evaluation indices: knows, can, owns and will be able.
Developing society requires the future specialist to form a generalized, professional-oriented
interest in a more general field of activity, which, in its turn, requires a systematic use of a wide variety
of means.
It is important to remember that the professional development of a person is closely related to his
development as a personality. How are they compared?
According to psychologists, professional, including competence, relies on a number of
personality features, including adherence to professional ethics, responsibility, internal focus of control,
responsiveness, etc. [4; 299].
The defining, in our opinion, today is the formation of a communicative culture of a professional
- a very controversial process that relies on assimilation of cultural values and self-knowledge.
Information training tools related to electronic technology should play a supporting role, since the
main role should be played by the intellect, manifested in the originality of thinking through the
originality of speech. And here personality self-identity comes to the fore. The process of regulation of
the student's self-awareness is relevant in the learning process, as, indeed, in the educational process.
The concept of ―communicative competence‖ is constantly being improved (L. Bachman, N.
Chomsky, D. Hymes, Van Ek J. A. and others). In her work ―Communicative Competence: Theory and
Practice of Learning‖, Sandra J. Savignon writes that success in solving the communicative tasks of a
future teacher depends on the readiness and disposition of a person to express himself in a foreign
language, resourcefulness, ingenuity in using the lexical and syntactic units he owns. [6, 84]
Savignon
(1971) used the term ‗‗communicative competence‘‘ to characterize the ability of classroom language
learners to interact with other speakers, to make meaning, as distinct from their ability to recite
dialogues or perform on discrete-point tests of grammatical knowledge [7].
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: