Байланысты: rekomendacii po napisaniju refleksivnykh otchetov
Borderline The account reflects
the
knowledge
and
understanding of how
the ideas of the Program
can
be
integrated
into teaching practice
within
one
lesson.
The account demonstrates
the methodology of
using the ideas of some
modules of the Program
in own teaching practice
within one lesson out of
the sequence.
Learning
aims
and
objectives formulated not
in accordance with the
SMART acronym.
The
evidence
of
learning are missing or
inconvincible.
Analysis is missing or
limited, the work is of a
descriptive matter.
The
work
contains
answers to the question
how
something
happened?
But, there are no answers
to the question: why is
something
happening/
happened?
The ideas expressed
in the account are not
consistent and logically
connected. The account
contains vague examples
of teaching practice (there
are vague words such as:
various tasks, different methods etc.). The paper’s
conclusions are absent.
The author’s opinion
is absent or limited.
The paper doesn’t contain
plans for future actions.
Failed The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
In order the reader could understand more clearly what is stipulated by the separate
descriptors, the trainer may suggest the following explanation:
