Borderline The account reflects
the
knowledge
and
understanding of how
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
can be integrated into
teaching practice within
the sequence of lessons.
Most of the tasks listed
in the manual «School-
based
tasks»
have
been tested in practice,
and the medium term
plan demonstrates the
methodology of using
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
in teaching practice.
The
evidence
of
learning are missing or
inconvincible.
Analysis is missing or
limited, the work is of a
descriptive matter.
The
work
contains
answers to the question
how
something
happened?
But, there are no
answers to the question:
why
is
something
happening/ happened?
The ideas expressed in the
account are not consistent
and logically connected.
The account contains
vague
examples
of
teaching practice (there
are vague words such
as:
various tasks,
different methods etc.).
The
paper’s
conclusions are absent.
The author’s opinion
is absent or limited.
The paper doesn’t contain
plans for future actions.
Failed The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
