190
KazTEA
2015
The next quick and valid testing assessment is b.socrative.com. It is a
student response system.
Socrative lets teachers engage and assess their students with educational
activities on tablets, laptops and smartphones. It promotes to make language material
authentic, students have an opportunity for listening and reading activities, and
teachers give students the comprehension questions before they listen to or read the
selection. This procedure sets up the information gaps that students seek to fill as they
listen or read. The goal of b.socrative.com is through the use of real time questioning,
instant result aggregation and visualization, teachers can gauge the whole class’
current level of understanding.
Socrative saves teachers time so the class can further collaborate, discuss,
extend and grow as a community of learners.
Only one way to find out, click on past the break to see all the cool screen
shots, a how to and a verdict. The only person in the class who needs an account is
the teacher. Students merely join a room without having to log in. There is no need
for a special app, it is all web based. So it doesn’t matter if the student is rocking an
iPad, BlackBerry or the latest gaming laptop, they all can participate.
Firstly the teacher creates the room and gets a room number, the students will
join using that room number. Once everyone is in the room the teacher can ask
questions and the students can respond in many different ways (check out the picture
below to see what options are available).
Now that you have for of an idea of what
Socrative.com
, let’s take a closer
look at the teacher side and then the student side to see how it all comes together.
191
KazTEA
2015
Once you’ve signed in you are welcomed to that same screen we saw above.
This is definitely a double-edged sword and gives a teacher a quick idea of who
is on the right track. On the other hand, there are those students who are fearful of
peer ridicule. We’ve all seen it, a student raises their hand and gives their “best”
answer and everyone has a chuckle and then you rarely hear from that student again.
This gives those students some anonymity when answering and when a crazy one
pops up, you see it and not the class. It gives them a chance to build a little
confidence. If you want people to see the results, you can click
Vote on responses
and
students will see the best answers and can weigh in on which one they feel is better
than the rest. Likewise on multiple choice questions, the teacher will ask the question
orally (or written on the board) and students will answer their question by selecting A
– E (I don’t think you can add or take away options). You, the teacher will see the
rests, but students won’t.
Another neat feature is the ability to create and give quizzes. You can create a
quiz and save in Socrative.com or you can make one using their template on Excel
and then import it. Either way you have a quiz. When students take the quiz they
must provide their name before starting. Once this is done they take the quiz. The
quiz itself can be self paced (meaning the students can go as fast or as slow as they
want) or you can control the quiz. You
also have the ability to randomize the answers
(for multiple choice questions). Immediate feedback is neat. Once a student answers a
question, they are told if it is correct or not and what the correct answer should be.
Check it out below.
192
KazTEA
2015
While the quiz is going on, you can check out the live results as students
answer a question. Once it is answered, it is done. In other words, this probably
shouldn’t be used for a final exam but it is a great way to get some immediate
feedback from everyone in the room about how things are going. Check out some live
results below.
When the quiz is finished, Socrative will let you download the results, email
them to you or skip them altogether. Just a little data to help you drive your
instruction.
When class is over you can Clear room which pretty much kicks everyone out,
but it does not change the room number. Meaning if a student knows the room
number they could “crash” your class as long as they have a device and an Internet
connection. So that’s the teacher perspective, let’s take a look at the student
perspective.
To sum up b.socrative.com is a nice service because it is free. Moreover for
teachers it’s necessary, firstly, to bear in mind some hints in designing tests:
-
a teacher should design interesting questions so that not to bore learners;
-
questions should be absolutely complicated;
-
a teacher should take the difficulty of the questions into account because
they are to have various levels (easy, common, and hard);
-
testing should be used as a sum of the studied material that is why we
couldn’t test every time;
-
any test will be worthless if it is so long that no one has the time to do it.
So any task is stick to time;
-
interactive tests have a powerful effect on student motivation.
Secondly the usage of alternative assessments in the process of teaching
has a number of advantages:
- evaluating objectivity as in testing the influence of subjective factors
(for example, such as awareness of the examiner on current progress of the
examinee, the account of his behaviour at lessons, etc.) is excluded;
193
KazTEA
2015
- reliability of the information about the volume of the acquired material
and about the level of its mastering;
- efficiency is possible to test simultaneously a grea t number of pupils,
and checking the results is easier and faster, than it is in the traditional form
of control;
- differentiating ability in tests, self and peer assessment there are tasks
of various levels;
- individual approach in teaching, the individual check and self -
examination of pupils’ knowledge are possible;
- comparability of test results for different groups of the pupils taught
with different interactive programs, e-books, and with using various methods
and organizational modes of e-learning.
We can conclude that different types of tests are very effective when we
make use of them all together, namely, in collaboration.
References:
1.Dietel R.J., Herman J.L., R.A. Knuth. What Does Research Say about Assessment? NCREL, Oak
Brook, 1991.
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |