Borderline The account reflects
the
knowledge
and
understanding of how the
ideas of one module are
used in teaching practice.
The account demonstrates
the methodology of
using the ideas of the
module in own teaching
and learning practice.
The
evidence
of
learning are missing or
inconvincible.
Analysis is missing or
limited, the work is of a
descriptive matter.
The work contains ans-
wers to the question how
something happened?
But, there are no
answers to the question:
why
is
something
happening/ happened?
The ideas expressed in the
account are not consistent
and logically connected.
The account contains
vague
examples
of
teaching practice (there
are vague words such
as:
various tasks,
different methods etc.).
The paper’s conclu-
sions
are
absent.
The author’s opinion
is absent or limited.
The paper doesn’t contain
plans for future actions.
Failed The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
The reflective account
was not handed in.
The reflective account is
an example of plagiarism.
Rubrics to: Medium term planning Knowledge and Understanding Application Reflection Good Pass The account reflects
the
knowledge
and
understanding of how
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
can be integrated into
teaching practice within
the sequence of lessons.
The account contains
logically
traceable
references
to
the
Program and additional
recommended material.
All the tasks listed in the
manual «School-based
tasks» have been tested in
practice, and the medium
term plan demonstrates
the methodology of using
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
in teaching practice.
There is a lot of valid
evidence of teacher and
students’ learning.
The
work
is
of
analytical
matter.
The
work
contains
answers to such questions
as
why
something
happened/ did not happen?
In the paper there are
findings and conclusions.
The author’s points of
view is clearly traced.
The paper contains plans
for future actions.
Pass The account reflects
the
knowledge
and
understanding of how
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
can be integrated into
teaching practice within
the sequence of lessons.
The account contains
logically
traceable
references
to
the
Program and additional
recommended material.
All the tasks listed in the
manual «School-based
tasks» have been tested in
practice, and the medium
term plan demonstrates
the methodology of using
the ideas of the seven
modules of the Program
in teaching practice.
There is a lot of valid
evidence of teacher and
students’ learning.
The
work
is
of
analytical
matter.
The
work
contains
answers to such questions
as
why
something
happened/ did not happen?
In the paper there are
findings and conclusions.
The author’s points of
view is clearly traced.