recipient(consumer) to make a purchase /13, p. 21/.ZhakSegel claims that “The magic of advertising is
an act of magic when occurs transformation from act of consumption to the specific culture”/14,p. 77/.
Practical value of this approach that it is not only narrowly targeted linguistic analysis of the
advertising message, but on the contrary, the study of linguistic knowledge and the operations undertaken
in a purely pragmatic purposes, such as increasing sales, maintaining the level of customer loyalty,
remembering the brand, "competitive advantages" and etc. /15, p. 128/.
Linguistic and cognitive aspects of traditional disciplines of advertising as branding, naming,
copywriting, segmentation and targeting, can be interesting and useful to practitioners advertisers. The
right combination of linguistic and cognitive positioning techniques, especially is so demanded in the
modern era of immaterial competition involves not only knowledge of specific techniques of manipulating
frames, but the ability to reconstruct them by analyzing the body of advertising messages and
textsofcompetitors/13, p. 23/.
By analyzing and rebuilding competitors’ messages increase effectiveness of advertisement
49
influence and allows your product or service to be more noticeable in some way than those around others
and settle in the mind of prospects. The second approach I noticed by reviewingsome of the new
researches of other academicians, there is a considerable shortage of empirical studies on international
segmentation,which would examine the link between segmentation and strategic positioning. Yet, many
researchers in a field of segmentation have stressed the critical importance of the relationship between
segmentation and positioning decisions. Segmentation and positioning decisions are central to the
development of global marketing strategy /16, p.554/.
Some of the authors define this strategy as“segmentationbased strategic positioning” and specify
that as “the company would cause the development of homogeneous responses for demand that differs
from responses received from other market segments” /17, p.89/. The global strategic segmentation and
positioning matrix is a new tool that guides managers to position their brands effectively in world markets.
Conclusion. In conclusion, I would like to say, that in our overcommunicated and overloaded of
advertising messages society company can succeed if and only if they are going to analyze the market
place conditions and take into consideration many aspects of their brand strengths and not only technical
but also emotional closeness to the customers. Positioning is one of the most important aspectsfor a brand
success.
Company must create positioning strategy and follow the factors which product perception,
brand loyalty, and strategic plan modifications, if they want to stand out from the crowd and earn not only
profit but also occupy a part in prospects’ minds. We can say that positioning affects on a formation of
successful perception of the brand by customer. Moreover it is a still developing model for business,
because even nowadays not every company pays attention to the positioning strategy, and how to create it
correctly knows only a small part of marketers.
In my paper I tried to uncover some of the most important factors which company has to take into
consideration if they want to succeed in a market place. Moreover, I included two approaches of
positioning where it combines some other studies, which are crucial in a fast changing and development
business world.
References
1. Ries, A.& Trout, J. (1982). Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. New York: Warner Books.
2. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. 15, #6 (2000), Emerald Article: Positioning
strategies in business markets
3. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 21 #6 (2007), Emerald Article:Positioning strategies of
international and multiculturaloriented service brands
4. Treacy, M.&Wiersema, F. (1994). The Discipline of Market Leaders. Reading, Mass.: Addison
Wesley
5. Crawford, F.& Matthews, R. (2001). The Myth of Excellence: Why Great Companies Never
Try to be the Best at Everything. New York: Crown Business
6. Ellson, T. (2004), Culture and Positioning as Determinants of Strategy Personality and the
Business Organization. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN
7. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Volume 10, Issue 1,
2000; Andreas Herrmann & Frank Huber
8. Levi, K. "Differentiate or Diminish: The Art and Necessity of Business Positioning", (March
2007)
9. Published by John Wiley &Sons., Hoboken, New Jersey; Kotler on marketing; URL:
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd0471268674.html
10. Journal: Проблемы Агрорынка, апрель – июнь / 2009г.;Article: “Разработка стратегии
позиционирования товаров и услуг на рынке”
11. Hooley, G. I., Saunders, I. A. and Piercy, N. F. (1998) ‘Marketing Strategy and Competitive
Positioning’, HemelHempstead: Prentice Hall Europe
12. Davidson, H. (1997) ‘Even More Offensive Marketing’, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
13. A. Г. Квят. – научная редакция «Филалогия» (2 июля 2008 год)Article:
50
“Позиционирование товаров и услуг в рекламном тексте: Лингвокогнитивный подход”
14. Лебедева Т. Ностальгия по будущему. — М.: Издво Московского университета, 2005
15. Шатин Ю.В. Построение рекламного текста. М.: БераторПресс, 2002
16. Douglas, S.P. and Crai, C.S. (1995), Global Marketing Strategy, McGrawHill, New York,
NY
17. Journal of Consumer Marketing 22/2 (2005); Article: “Linking global market segmentation
decisions with strategic positioning options”
УДК: 330.341.4:339.13;330.341.44
THE DANGER OF TRİBAL RELATİONSHİPS İN ORGANİZATİONS
Ubaydulla A., Kalykbergenova I., Karash D.
Scientific Supervisor, Yelena V. Smirnova. MSc
Suleyman Demiel University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences
Annotation. Development of employees has become an important aspect of every organization.
However, in organizations, some employees are relatives of their leaders or bosses. So, the main
purpose of this research is to analyze tribal relationships in organizations.
Key words: tribal relationships, organizations, Kazakhtan
Түйін. Бұл зерттеу жұмысының негізгі мақсаты – жегжаттық қарым қатынастардың
жақсы және жаман жақтарын айқындау. Алайда, кейбір ұйымдардың жұмыскерлері бірбірімен
туыстық қарымқатынаста. Біздің алып отырған жұмысымыздың негізгі мақсаты – ұйымдардың
туыстық қарым – қатынастарын зерттеу.
Аннотация. Повышение квалификации работников является главным аспектом в каждой
организации. Однако, некоторые имеют работников, которые являются родственниками тех или
иных работников, или даже директоров. Главной целью нашей работы является выявить
родственные отношения в организациях.
Introduction. Every organization is really a set of small towns. The people are different in
every town, and the roles are never exactly the same. We call these small towns tribes, and they form
so naturally it’s as though our tribe is part of our genetic code. Tribes helped humans survive the last
ice age, build farming communities, and, later, cities.
There are people who accept that working with the loved ones are extremely unmanageable and
unreasonable, however there are individuals who accept that just with the individuals you think about,
you can execute the most brave tasks. Throughout the Soviet Union joint collaboration of relatives are
not allowed.So, in organizations employees shouldn’t rely on their tribal relationships. If the
relativesask to recruite them , there are three choices. The primary is to abstain from anything, however
may endure individual connections, and a persisting feeling of blame. The second is to help settle down
regardless, not being mindful of the outcomes. Third, the surest and most ideal path is to have a
discussion with a companion, coating all the critical focuses. Having recognized all the advantages and
disadvantages and concede to the tenets of engagement at work.
Companions and partners dependably quicker, they know how to discover the methodology to
one another to tackle any issues. At the same time it is alluring that around them were close to home
connections, as well as they still might have liked one another as experts, while believing the skill of
both. At the point when two individuals see one another, "superbly" any unpredictable circumstance
51
might be determined in more level expense and quicker victory. Think about the upsides and
downsides of the circumstances, the relationship of plans: partner companion and slavecompanion.
Preferences of mapping associate companion. " Amateur simpler adjusts in the group on
account of his companion, immediately included in the workflow. In the event that still companions are
one connection in the work, it is watched that the workflow accompanies some increasing speed. This
is because of the way that between them there is no need, in the supposed "pritirke", everybody knows
the capacities and conceivable outcomes of the other. Consequently, instantly going on quick inclusion.
Cons begin when a companion new kid on the block solicitations to do something for him.
From the start it is very satisfactory, however in the event that it turns into a propensity, it will prompt
what one's workload will develop separately will begin to develop and weariness that prompt
depressive considerations "and I didn't complete everything. On the other hand more awful, that getting
in a position to stop the control of his companion simply can't, faulting yourself in the "own blame, that
I had him here," which can prompt more noteworthy misuses. The most noticeably bad choice might be
the same, that individual data could be made, however impart it to associates in arrangements not
incorporated.
"Slavecompanion plan", its pluse. To the person who has long been acquainted with more
certainty and think you can believe him with the most capable thing. In discussion he can give a more
goal appraisal of your work, educate the world concerning what is occurring in the group, about your
trustworthiness, new activities and practically pressing issues the principle burden of this plan is the
"nature" that permits slave companion to test the requests, not to perform the occupation, don't be
bashful in communicating their feelings. A crash can collaborate with other individuals and to make
contrary data in violation of individual limits of his companion and manager /1/.
Literature review. Tribes in organizations accomplish work – frequently a great deal of work –
yet they don't structure due to work. Tribes are the essential building piece of any expansive human
exertion, including acquiring a living. Thusly, their impact is more excellent than that of teams,entire
organizations, and even superstar Presidents. In organizations, tribes choose whether the new pioneer
is going to thrive or get taken out. They figure out what amount of work accomplishes, and of what
quiality. A few tribes request greatness for everybody, and are continually developing. Others are
cntent to do the base to get by. What makes the difrerences in execution? Tribal pioneers. Tribal
pioneers center their exertions on building the tribe – or, all the more exactly, overhauling the tribal
society. On the off chance that they are fruitful, the tribe remembers them as the pioneers, giving top
exertion, cutlike devotion, and a track record of triumph. Divisions and organizations run by Tribal
Pioneers set the standard of execution in their commercial enterprises, from profit and gainfulness to
worker maintenance. They are ability magnets, with individuals so earger to work for the laeder that
they will take a pay cut if essential. Tribal pioneers get such a large number of advancements in such a
brief time, to the point that individuals frequently spread buzz that they will be the following President.
Their deliberations appear smooth, leaving numerous individuals astounded by how they do it /3/.
A Tribal Pioneer huge numbers of us know from history is George Washington. His single
significant commitment was in changing thirteen assorted states into one individual. In the event that
we research what Washington really did, he constructed a solitary distinguish (measureable by what
individuals said) to an arrangement of organized tribes. One was the rich in Virginia social order,
maybe fewer than a hundred individuals. An alternate was the Mainland Congress, initially fiftyfive
representatives. The third was the officer class of the Mainland Armed force. Each one time,
Washington headed the assembly to solidarity by recognizing its "tribalness", by getting its parts to
discuss what unfiled them: esteeming flexibility, loathing the lord's most recent ta, or needing to win
the battle. As he constructed the normal cause in every tribe, a mission gelled and they grasped "we're
extraordinary" dialect. Washington's splendor in each one case was that the man and the reason got
synonymous, with the pioneer forming the tribe and the tribe calling hence the pioneer. This is the
means by which Tribal Authority meets expectations: the pioneer updates the tribe grasps the pioneer.
Tribes and pioneers make one another /2/.
52
Six degrees of separation is the theory that everyone and everything is six or fewer steps
away, by way of introduction, from any other person in the world, so that a chain of "a friend of a
friend" statements can be made to connect any two people in a maximum of six steps. It was originally
set out by FrigyesKarinthy and popularized by a play written by John Guare /3/.
For example, we can say about Adidas and Puma companies.In the spring, after father's death,
the brothers split up because of the quarrel. Rudolph took one factory, and Adolf is another. They
agreed not to use the name and symbols of the family business. ADI named his firm Addas and Ruda is
a Rudy. But after a few months of Addasis Adidas (abbreviation of AdiDassler) and Ruda is a Puma. It
ceased to exist at that time, world famous brand Dassler. The brothers for the rest of his life remained
silent about the causes of the quarrel. Maybe Rudy has never been able to forgive the Adi, after the
war, he tried to get it out of the POW camp, using familiarity with American officers. Or maybe they
just haven't been able to split the inheritance of the father. In any case, after the collapse of the family
business brothers didn't speak to each other, and Puma and Adidas were the fiercest competitors
/4/.Although they are competitors, but they are connected by the company Dassler, their relationships
bind them.
The rules for hiring relatives:
1. Does not show compassion to "poor" relative to take it to work, use only its professionalism.
2. During business hours, your cousin is a specialist, not a native person; the requirements
should be the same as to all.
3. Do not exceed the relative high loyalty or increased requirements.
4. Do not carry anything conflicts with relatives /5/.
How we build relationships with people, largely depends on where we interact with them. Home,
family, friendsone thing. Jobs, business connections – another thing. But consider these two components
of human communication independently of each other, it would be a mistake. One way or another, but
they intersect. Who among you has not been confronted with a situation where even today just
colleagues, today is a happy married couple? And the fact that parents try to help their children in early
labour, too, is understandable. Get a job, and without at least some experience, oh so easy.
Methodology. The following research methods were used in this work: internet survey, interviews
and literature search. We interviewed adults aged 25 to 50 years old and have been working.
Interviewedseventy people,. 21 of them 2531 years old, 32 of people 32 39 years old, 17 of them 40
50 years old. They are: entrepreneurals, employees of Kazakhtelecom,realtors, accountants, teachers of
school. We asked them fourth questions.
Results. The first question was:Do you know about tribal relations? About 70% of interviewed
people know, 20% only listen about it and 10% don’t know. We can say that people didn’t like the
tribal relations in organizations.
The second question was: What way do you use to get a job? And how we were convinced
nowadays a lot of people get their jobs by connections. Of course, not every people told us openly, they
didn’t want to tell, but in reality they admitted. And their quantity consists about 65%. Here a few number
of people, who got their jobs by own efforts35%. And nobody of interviewed people didn’t say about
bribes(Figure 1).
Figure 1 – How people find jobs
53
The third question was: Why do the problems arise withtribal relations in governmental
organization? Some people think that relative or friend cannot refuse to work with this or that person, who
his/her knows. Instead of going forward, they won’t obey, will become impudent and will be idle at work.
It will bring crashes for the organization. Their quantity is more – 60%. Some people think, that it is better
to hire familiar person, because they know that or this person better – 40%. Of course, on the other hand it
is good. You know new hired person, you know in what way you should work with that person. Not all,
but some people want to work with known person.
Figure 3 –Problems with tribal relationships in governmental organizations
The fourth question was: Dotribal relations help or disturb you in organizations?How we say
before there are two sides of people’s opinion. Some of interview people, 70% of them, told that tribal
relations in organizations disturb them. Not every your friend or relative want to work hardly like you or
don't adhere your tactics of work. It influence in bad side to working. And some of them – 3% told that
tribal relation help in organizations. You should not get used for that of this person, because you know
that or his person. In one team you can have your friends or relatives and think that your team will be
more productivity that earlier.
Conclusion. In collaboration with relatives has its pluses and minuses. Among the advantages of
relationship can be called a long standing friendship, perfect understanding and honesty. But all these
fine qualities will not cost a penny when a staff – relatives in the working team. Still better honesty deny
the request of a relative in an “attach” it to team than to unravel the consequences.
Most importantly we must remember that every person is responsible for selecting its path. We
need to give comprehensive information to your relative and try to be as honest with them and yourself.
References
1. Tribal relations at work, available at: http://psychologyrostov.ru
54
2. D. Logan, J. King, H. Fischer Wright Tribal leadership of leveraging natural groups to build a
thriving organization – Los Angeles: Harper Business, 2012. p.15
3. Six degrees of separation, available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
4. Nepotism in the company, available at: http://www.propersonal.ru/journal
5. Business and family, available at: http://indivip.ru/sovety/biznesirodstvenniki.html
УДК: 339.138
FUTURE OF INTERACTIVE MARKETING
B.E. Kaskarauov, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi
Scientific Supervisor: Z.T. Kozhamkulova, Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi
The field of marketing is changing rapidly. Consumer marketing, in particular, articulated a clear
consumer benefit, worked with an advertising agency to create ads that communicated this benefit, and
"pushed" ads at consumers through the mass media, one size–fits–all mass mailings, and telemarketing
blasts. Interactive marketing is defined as an integrated exchange process by which an organization uses
the understanding of customer behavior, technology, and other resources to create and manage customer
value and collaborative relationships and enhance shareholder value through relevant brands,
products/service offerings, ideas, and messages communicated and delivered to the right customers
through appropriate channels and contact points at appropriate times. One of the articles in this issue
suggests that the digital interactive transformation in marketing is not changing the model of direct
marketing in the expected direction. Taken together, these articles not only provide an excellent overview
of some of the key topics in interactive marketing, but also offer an integrated view of a sizable portion of
the field.
The field of marketing is changing rapidly. For several decades, a primary role of marketing was to
orchestrate the mix of product, price, promotion and place. Consumer marketing, in particular, articulated
a clear consumer benefit, worked with an advertising agency to create ads that communicated this benefit,
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |