Written feedback
Effective feedback depends on pupils being clear about what is expected of
them and what they can expect from the teacher. Pupils should expect the
feedback they receive to explain what they have done well with reasons, and
where and how they can improve. Where this is the case they are more likely
to engage with its content.
The learning objectives and learning outcomes should be used as the
benchmark for the teacher’s oral and written feedback. They should be
shared and made clear to pupils in advance of attempting the task. For
example, if the learning outcome for the pupil is to be able to write a letter to
a headteacher persuading him to agree to a school council, it is not
appropriate for the feedback to concentrate simply on spelling and grammar
– it should focus more on the use of appropriate conventions for persuasive
writing in a formal context which will have been taught beforehand.
Pupils should be given written feedback that provides clear evaluation of
their strengths and weaknesses, prompts further thought and reasoning, and
identifies the next step in their learning.
To be able to identify the next steps in pupils’ learning, teachers need an
understanding of subject progression and to be able to recognise pupils’
misconceptions and difficulties.
Quality feedback
• Feedback to any pupil should be about the particular qualities of his or her work,
with advice on what he or she can do to improve, and should avoid comparisons
with other pupils.
• Feedback has been shown to improve learning where it gives each pupil specific
guidance on strengths and weaknesses, preferably without any overall marks.
Inside the black box Black and Wiliam (1998)
Factors to consider in written feedback:
• pupil expectation
• teacher expectation
• shared learning objectives
• shared learning outcomes
• ideas of progression
• recognition of pupil misconceptions and challenges
Some characteristics of constructive
written feedback include:
• focusing on the learning objectives selectively
• confirming that pupils are on the right track
• stimulating the correction of errors or improvement of a piece of work
• scaffolding or supporting pupils’ next steps
• providing opportunities for pupils to think things through for themselves
• commenting on progress over a number of attempts
• avoiding comparisons with other pupils
• providing pupils with the opportunities to respond
92
Questioning and dialogue
Teaching strategies for effective dialogue
Eavesdropping on group dialogue
Teacher listens for evidence of learning either
to transfer ideas from one group to another or
to feed into later whole-class dialogue. Here
they can plan the order in which groups feed
back to orchestrate rich whole-class discussion.
They may prime pupils in preparation for this.
Sometimes they may intervene to stimulate
more effective group discussion.
Questions linked to resources or tasks
A resource is used to help open up an issue
through a specific question – for example, the
two plants discussed in handout 7.1 (part 2).
Resources can be powerful aids if they are
chosen to set up and complement both
challenging questioning and
learning through responses to the challenges.
Wait time after a teacher question
Pupils are given time to reflect independently
on a question, to think and formulate ideas
before being asked to answer.
Big questions
A significant question that cannot be answered
immediately. By its nature, it draws answers
from many pupils and encourages them to
come up with a list of smaller questions they
need to answer before an answer to the big
question can be formulated. Sometimes the
‘smaller questions’ are provided by the teacher.
Rich questions
Open-ended, higher-order questions which
require learners either to link or to apply ideas,
give reasons, summarise or evaluate.
Sometimes they force pupils to ask themselves
further questions to qualify what the question
is actually asking them to explain. The answers
to such questions generally require extended
answers.
Teacher models prompts and body language
to encourage continuation
Use of body language or verbal prompts to
encourage pupils to develop their answers. For
example ‘Go on…’ or nodding when the pupil
stalls. By making these explicit the intention is
that pupils adopt similar strategies in their
group dialogue
No hands-up questioning
Teacher selects the pupil who will respond to a
question, i.e. they are conscripts rather than
volunteers. By watching pupils’ body language
it is often possible to identify those who have
ideas to contribute.
Peer discussion
Teacher prompts dialogue, often via a
question, to enable peer interaction to support
learning. The opportunity to discuss ideas
within pairs or small groups helps pupils
articulate and check ideas before they reveal
their group’s answer to the whole class.
Answers are better formed through the group
talk.
Cues and prompts
Teacher uses gestures or short phrases to bring
pupils into the dialogue, e.g. ‘Does anyone
disagree?’ or ‘Who can help us to think this
idea through?’
Pausing to scan or survey
The teacher stands back to take stock of the
learning across the class. This enables them to
quickly assess what the pupils can do, can
partially do or can’t do, and to adjust the
teaching in response.
Wait time after a pupil response
Pupils are given time to reflect on a peer’s
response to a question. This enables them to
check whether they understand it and to
formulate a further response which builds on
what has been said.
Using wrong or partially correct answers to
prompt responses
Teacher models not being sure about what the
right answer is, i.e. teacher seen to take risks
and be vulnerable, or teacher helps pupil
unpick thinking leading up to partially correct
93
response and asks others to challenge or
support each step.
Using group discussion strategies
Teacher employs strategies such as envoying,
rainbow groups, jigsawing and snowballing to
structure group work so that dialogue remains
focused and ideas from pupils are effectively
shared across the groups.
effective dialogue
Teacher explicitly comments on the features of
effective dialogue where they occur.
Models interest and enthusiasm
Teacher models respect for others’ points of
view by reflecting on them and exploring
them, or models a positive response to sincere
‘off the wall’ comments, or is excited about a
good response.
Varying length of wait time.
The length of wait time is adjusted according
to
the importance and level of challenge in the
question – for example, from a few seconds for
thought to longer pauses of a few minutes for
reflection or discussion.
Negotiating whether answers are right or
wrong and why
Teacher invites a vote on a reasoned response,
or crystalises the views of two camps to help
focus further discussion, or constructively
challenges points raised by providing an
alternative argument
or perspective.
The formative use of summative tests
• Pupils should be engaged in a reflective review of the work they have done to enable them to
plan their revision effectively.
• Pupils should be encouraged to set questions and mark answers to help them, both to
understand the assessment process and to focus further efforts for improvement.
• Pupils should be encouraged through peer and self-assessment to apply criteria to help them
understand how their work might be improved.
• Summative tests should be, and should be seen to be, a positive part of the learning process.
94
References
Cole, G. (2006) 101 Essentials Lists for using ICT in the classroom. Continuum International
Publishing Group.
Biggs JB (1987), Student Approaches to Learning and Study, Melbourne: Australian Council for
Educational Research
Bloom B.S. et al. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational goals: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, New
York: David McKey
Blogger in the Classroom. Online at:
http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/ru//
educators/activities/pdfs_GTA/CribSheet.Blogger3.pdf
Accessed 18.06.2012
Bragham G. (2006) How to survive and succeed with interactive whiteboard. LDA (Learning
Development Aids)
Brookfield S. (1987) Developing critical thinking: challenging adults to explore Alternative
Ways of thinking and Acting. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fisher R. (2005) Teaching children to think. Nelson Thornes LTD.
Fontichiaro K. (2008) Podcasting at school, London. Libraries unlimited Key Stage 3 National
Strategy. Crown copyright 2005 Introduction DfES 1099-2005 G
Gibbs G (1981), Teaching Students to Learn: a student-centred approach, Milton Keynes: Open
University Press
Goodhew, G. (2009) Meeting the needs of Gifted and Talented students, Continuum International
Publishing Group.
Honey P and Mumford A (1992), The Manual of Learning Styles,
revised edition, obtainable from Peter Honey, Maidenhead SL6 6HB
Hymer, B. (2002) Gifted and Talented learners, David Fulton Publishers LTD.
Kent, G. (1996) Teaching the Able Pupil, Pearson Publishing.
Leicester M. (2010) Teaching critical thinking skills. Continuum International Publishing group
Stephen E. Toulmin (1958) The uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press.
Top Tips 50 podcasting ideas for the classroom. A helpful guide to get you started with
podcasting. Online at:
http://www.podiumpodcasting.com/pdfs/podiumTopTipsGuideWEB.pdf
Accessed
18.06.2012
Using Blogs to Integrate Technology in the Classroom. Online at:
http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/47
Accessed
18.06.2012
95
Watkins et al. (2000)
Learning about Learning. Resources for supporting effective learning.
Routledge, London
5 Strategies for Using Wikis in the Classroom. Online at:
http://david-r-wetzel.suite101.com/5-
strategies-for-using-wikis-in-the-classroom-a124331
Accessed 18.06.2012
6 Strategies for Using a Smart Board in Class. Online at:
http://david-r-wetzel.suite101.com/6-
strategies-for-using-a-smart-board-in-class-a115550
Accessed 18.06.2012
11 advantages of using a blog for teaching. Online at:
http://www.slideshare.net/frankcalberg/11-
advantages-of-using-a-blog-for-teaching
Accessed 18.06.2012
Достарыңызбен бөлісу: |